Primary Argument Questions Essay Assignment
Description
Choose ANY TWO of the following. Each question is worth 50% of your overall test grade for Test 2.
1) (i) outline (include subcomponents and subarguments of the overall argument) Sioui’s argument; (ii) elaborate three arguments not referenced in the piece itself (do not reference any arguments from Morito either or in the introduction or conclusion by Williston for this piece) to suggest that Sioui’s argument suffers from tensions/confusions/problems; and (iii) defend Sioui’s argument with three arguments not offered by Sioui himself or by Morito/Williston.
2) (i) outline (include subcomponents and subarguments of the overall argument) Morito’s argument; (ii) elaborate three arguments not referenced in the piece itself (do not reference any arguments from Sioui/Williston either) to suggest that Morito’s argument suffers from tensions/confusions/problems; and (iii) defend Morito’s argument with three arguments not offered by Morito himself or by Sioui/Williston.
3) With reference to the YouTube posted in lieu of a live lecture, (i) outline (include subcomponents and subarguments of the overall argument) Dr. Shiva’s argument; (ii) elaborate three arguments not referenced in the video itself to suggest that Dr. Shiva’s argument suffers from tensions/confusions/problems; and (iii) defend Dr. Shiva’s argument with three arguments not offered by Dr. Shiva herself.
4) With reference to Byron Williston’s Epistemic Virtue and the Ecological Crisis”, (i) outline (include subcomponents and subarguments of the overall argument) Williston’s argument; (ii) elaborate three arguments not referenced in the article itself to suggest that Williston’s argument suffers from tensions/confusions/problems; and (iii) defend Williston’s argument with three arguments not offered by Williston himself in the piece.
5) (i) outline (include subcomponents and subarguments of the overall argument) Schönfeld’s argument; (ii) elaborate three arguments not referenced in the piece itself (or by Williston) to suggest that Schönfeld’s argument suffers from tensions/confusions/problems; and (iii) defend Schönfeld’s argument with three arguments not offered by Schönfeld himself (or by Williston in the prelude/afterlude) in the piece.
6) (i) outline (include subcomponents and subarguments of the overall argument) Gardiner’s argument; (ii) elaborate three arguments not referenced in the piece itself (or by Williston) to suggest that Gardiner’s argument suffers from tensions/confusions/problems; and (iii) defend Gardiner’s argument with three arguments not offered by Gardiner himself (or by Williston in the prelude/afterlude) in the piece.
All the best!
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/or