Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Museum Visit Observation
PLEASE USE THE PICTURE I PROVIDED (artist: Hervé Télémaque)
1. Formal properties
Visual elements – colors, value, texture, movement, contrast, light, geometric or organic shapes, lines, time, motion, rhythm
Composition – balance, focal point, movement, direction, repetition, proportion, balance, symmetry
Space – how is the illusion of space created or not created
Style – realistic, abstract/representational, figurative, expressive, conceptual
What mood or feeling does the artwork convey to you? Why?
If you could, how would you enter, travel through and exit the artwork?
2. Subject matter
What is the first thing that comes to mind when you look at the artwork?
Based on your observations what is the artwork about?
What clues do you see that support your observation?
If you could step into the artwork, what would you hear, feel, do, say?
What is the concept, idea or narrative the artist is trying to convey?
Is there a hidden message?
3. Historical Context
Who made it and why?
Did it have a function?
Would contemporary audience interpret or understand the work differently compared to the audiences who saw it when it was created?
Does the work reflect what is/was happening in society historically or politically?
4. Additional Questions/Observations: Once you have answered all the above questions, make a list of your own questions (between three to four questions and answer them) and read any wall text or brochure information available about the work.
At Home: If you found the subject matter, style, material or specific cultural background interesting, please research more about what grabbed your attention.
Do you have a new understanding of the artwork based on your research?
Does the background information change any of your opinion or interpretations that you made at the museum?
Does it help answer any questions you might have had at the museum?
Would different audiences interpret the work differently?
Would contemporary audience interpret or understand the work differently compared to the audiences who saw it when it was created?
Please form a conclusion based on your own observations and the researched information about the artwork and/or artist.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/