MGMT 3340 Leadership Project

January 7, 2023

MGMT 3340 Leadership Project

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

MGMT 3340 Leadership Project

MGMT 3340, Fall, 2022

Two Choices for Marcel Lammer to make up missing assignments,

The purposes of both projects are to help you be a better leader in the future.

Leadership Project

View the following three related theories

Traits Approaches

Behavioral Approaches

Situational Approaches

Evaluate the pros and cons of each theory.

Also, use yourself as an example to discuss yourself in these three areas. What are your areas of strengths and weaknesses in these three areas? How would you enhance your liability in each of the areas?

To make it professional, you must have a cover page and at least five sections, i.e., introduction, three Approaches, self-evaluation, and a summary. You have to provide at least five references. Of course, no typos or major Grammarly mistakes. Also, make sure not to copy from other sources directly. I will check the matching rate to ensure plagiarism is free.

Seven Habits to become a successful professional

Please review the books and videos and write the following sections:

What are seven habits? Explain everything in detail.

Conduct a self-evaluation of yourself.

What are character ethics and personality ethic? What is your core ethic in these two areas?

Write a personal mission statement. Starting from the center of our Circle of Influence and Alternative Centers.

What are four generations of time management? How will you manage your time in the future?

Please use a similar guideline to write the paper.

[Order Now]

MGMT 3340 Leadership Project

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.