Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Please write the given topic(title) based on the following main points
Abstruct
Gender and Resource Extracting: The Case of the Maroons of Suriname Resource extraction is a highly gendered activity. Yet, despite the type of gender, the resource extraction is a very important for rapid economic growth. Every human person, whether male or female, has a major role to play in economic development, for individual, communal, or national sectors of life. Seck and Simons study on ‘Resource Extraction and the Human Rights of Women and Girls’ identifies that the relationship between the women and the resource extraction is complex, pointing out “Large-scale mining and oil and gas development is highly gendered and deeply masculine”1. Although women from some countries and regions of the world may work as employees, managers, lawyers, or executives in the sectors of mining and oil extraction, some communities discriminate against women when it comes to resource extraction. Heemskert provides the best example of women discrimination among the Maroons of Suriname in gold mining. The study has conducted among the Ndjuka Maroons in Suriname, South America, has established that few Ndjuka women participate in mining. In light of the impact of gender discrimination and classification in resource extraction, the study seeks to identify the household economic consequences of excluding women from resource extraction among the Maroons of Suriname.
Study Objectives:
The objectives of the essay is to establish whether indeed there is gender bias in resource extraction, to determine the role that culture plays in gender discrimination and to find out whether the gender discrimination in resource extraction is prevalent in a certain ethnicities and races as compared to others.
Research Questions :
I. What role does gender bias play in resource extraction among the Maroons of Suriname?
II. What effects do gendered resource extraction biases have on individuals, families, and society in general?
III. What steps can be taken to address issues of gender bias in resource extraction?
Theoretical Framework and Methodology:
Varieties of theories examine and explore the phenomenon of gender, especially when it comes to the classification of roles. Some of the gender theories are social constructionism, feminism theory, structural functionalism, critical theory, conflict theory, positivism, and social change. In view of the subject of gender bias on the resource extraction, the study would focus on the theories of social constructionism, structural functionalism, and social change. The study would employ based on relevant literatures. The essence of using relevant literatures is to be able to obtain data from the ground and from experts and scholars who have studied the subject of gender biases in resource extraction, particularly among the population of the Maroons.
Bibliography
Heemskerk, Marieke. “Gender and Gold Mining: The Case of the Maroons of Suriname.”
Women and International Development 202, no. 269, (2000): 1-33.
Khoesial, Sheela. Women Food Producers in Suriname: Technology and Marketing. San Jose:
IICA Biblioeca Venezuela, 1996.
Seck, Sara, and Penelope Simons. “Resource Extraction and the Human Rights of Women and
Girls: Policy Recommendations Associated with the Feminist International Assistance Policy.” Research Gate (2018): 1-14
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/