Ethics in Nonprofit Organizations

January 28, 2023

Ethics in Nonprofit Organizations

Order Number	6746452467687543
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Ethics in Nonprofit Organizations

In the field of public relations, professionals have to continually balance personal ethics, professional ethics, and situational need in order to resolve ethical questions and quandaries. The purpose of this essay is to ask you to articulate your ethical perspective and then apply that to either a nonprofit or corporate context. Your paper should be 3-4 pages in length You must include a minimum of three credible, academic or professional references beyond the textbook. Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment. Your essay should be a coherent and well-developed essay focusing on the relationships between personal and professional ethics in the nonprofit sector. This essay will have two sections that need to be connected in the paper’s overall thesis and your discussion/conclusions. Section 1: Your Personal Ethics In no more than one page, articulate your personal ethics statement. This should summarize your overall ethical worldview, its foundations, and ethical boundaries in a professional context, all of which you believe are important. Section 2: Ethical Case—Care4All Imagine that you are working as a public relations professional whose primary responsibility is developing corporate and large donations for a nonprofit organization, Care4All, that delivers healthcare to people in your community who cannot otherwise afford it. Your organization relies primarily on donations and corporate partnerships in order to provide for its patients. One of the challenges of large corporate donors is that they often expect a ‘quid pro quo’ for donations—such as a substantial amount of free advertising or even, in one donor’s case, asking for their sister to be hired as a nurse (she was a fully qualified nurse). Last year the fundraising objectives were not met, with the charity raising only 97% of its targeted goal for fundraising. You are tasked with ensuring that the fundraising objectives are met for this year. Many ideas have been offered such as more event fundraising, small donor fundraising, and fees for services based on income. You have been tasked to develop a sketch of an initial strategic plan for the next year identifying key needs/problems, measurable objectives, critical stakeholders to engage, and to develop a specific set of ethical principles guiding the strategic plan. This plan need on ly sketch out the key principles to be considered by the team, but it needs to be delivered quickly, so it should focus on core principles, objectives, and recommendations with strong support. It is important that you tie in personal and professional ethical considerations to your analysis of the case and recommendations.

[Order Now]

Ethics in Nonprofit Organizations

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.