EA3 Fall 2022 Prompt 1 Harrison Bergeron Essay

December 6, 2022

EA3 Fall 2022 Prompt 1 Harrison Bergeron Essay

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

EA3 Fall 2022 Prompt 1 Harrison Bergeron Essay

[Order Now]

ENGL 1301/Fall 2022: Essay #3 (EA3)

This is the final assignment for the course. This prompt/directions file is two pages – make sure to view

both pages. Follow all directions for this assignment.

This essay is worth 100 points and is worth 35% of the overall grade in the course. This essay will be 5

pages long (four pages of text, Works Cited page is page five), approximately 1000-1200 words, and

typed in the correct MLA format. In accordance with the ENGL 1301 Instructor Guidelines/Policies file

(see file in Blackboard), a paper not the correct format will NOT receive credit.

To earn credit for this assignment, the essay will be attached – as a Word Document or as a PDF file –

through the assignment submission link the course’s Blackboard shell. Repeat: The attached file must a

Word Document or a PDF file. If you are unsure, or using a different format, ask the instructor.

When submitting your essay, name the file FirstInitialLastName_EA3. If your name in Dean Moriarty,

the file name should be DMoriarty_EA3. (NOTE: Points are not deducted for filename; it is just a tool to

make sure the correct file is being attached.)

The submission link will open on Friday, 09 December 2022, at 8am CT. An

announcement will be posted in Blackboard.

Essay #3 will be submitted—for FULL CREDIT—SUNDAY, 11 DECEMBER

2022, before 11:59pm CT (the end of the day). **Remember to review the Late

Work Policy for major assignments.

===================================================================================

Use all the available materials/videos (see the Essay #3 Folder on the Course Content page in

Blackboard) to develop ONE the following prompts into a well-organized essay.

Here are the prompts for Essay #3:

❖ In both Ha Jin’s “Saboteur” and Kurt Vonnegut, Jr’s “Harrison Bergeron” depict government officials

in unique ways. Write a comparative analysis of how the authors show the power of the authority

figures. Your paper should show specific examples from both stories to support your thesis/claim.

❖ Both stories have a similar plot/conflict device – man vs society. Both stories also champion the

rights of an individual. Write an argumentative analysis that proves which story, Ha Jin’s

“Saboteur” or Kurt Vonnegut, Jr’s “Harrison Bergeron,” does a better job of showing the

importance of personal freedom.

EA3_Fall 2022_Prompt 2

POINTS TO REMEMBER:

Take advantage of the time given to complete this assignment. Do not wait until the last minute to

start this paper. Use the time allotted to plan/ask questions/et cetera. Have the draft ready to

submit when the submission link opens. Remember: This is the final assignment – there are no “doovers.”

You do not need to do any “research” online to complete this assignment. You have enough

experience, ability, intelligence, et cetera to complete this assignment without going online to find

anything.

The paper will be evaluated on how well you use the sources and how well you explain your

interpretation. Please do not try to “sell” how great the works are. Basic grammar rules still apply.

Errors in sentence construction, misuse of punctuation, mechanical errors, et cetera will lower

score evaluation.

The assignment is a 5-page paper.
The Works Cited page (page five of the paper) will have two items listed in alphabetical order by

author’s last name, not by order of use in the paper (example will be given; pay attention to

videos).

[Order Now]

All material needed to complete this assignment is available in the Essay #3 Folder. NO

ADDITIONAL OUTSIDE SOURCE MATERIAL REQUIRED OR NEEDED FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT. ANY

STRAY OUTSIDE SOURCE WILL RESULT IN AUTOMATIC NO-CREDIT FOR THE ASSIGNMENT.

SafeAssign – the plagiarism checker in Blackboard – will check for copied language. Given the

nature of the assignment, the entire class has the same prompt options, the acceptable percentage

of copied language is 30%.

Do not wait until the last minute to ask questions, or worse, start the assignment.

EA3 Fall 2022 Prompt 1 Harrison Bergeron Essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.