Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Description of LASA:
Revisit the literature you synthesized in Week 5 RA, taking into account the feedback received from your professor. A revised literature review will be included in this LASA assignment. In this assignment, you will apply the cultural theories from the Cultural Theoretical Approaches Literature Review (Week 4 RA) to an examination of the globalization trends and the changing relationships between corporations, governments and civil society, surrounding the concept of corporate social responsibility in multinational companies.
Directions:
In a 18-20-page report:
Your paper should be a 18-20-page Word document, using a minimum of 11 sources. Make sure you write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Use the APA format.
LASA Grading Criteria
(CO:1,2,3,4; PO:1,2,3,4; LO: 1,2,3,4,5,6)
Assignment Components | Proficient | Maximum Points |
Communicates knowledge of the role of international governments and civil society in the global economy
CO: 4 PO 1, 2, 3 ILOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
Response incorporates analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides necessary details and specific examples.
|
|
Demonstrates the ability to analyze cultural approaches, globalization, and CSR.
CO: 2 PO 1, 2, 3 ILOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples. Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts. Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature |
|
Demonstrates the ability to analyze the political, legal, social, cultural, economic, technological, and environmental trends in the context of the current global economy
CO 1 PO 1 ILO 1, 3, 6
|
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples. Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts. Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature |
|
Demonstrates the ability to assess the value of multinational corporations in increasing wealth, improving lives and communities, alleviating poverty, and preserving a healthy natural environment in the places where they operate.
CO: 4 PO 1, 2, 3 ILOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
|
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts. Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature |
|
Demonstrates the ability to apply the concepts, theories, and models synthesized in the Literature Review to recommend business strategies for multinational corporations entering new countries to ensure business success in a responsible way.
CO 3 PO 1, 4 ILO 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 |
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts. Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature |
|
Academic Writing
|
||
Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e. APA); and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
PO 3 ILO 2, 4, 6
|
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. | . |
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/