CHS 305 Interdisciplinary Team Work Essay

December 14, 2022

CHS 305 Interdisciplinary Team Work Essay

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

CHS 305 Interdisciplinary Team Work Essay

CHS ,305 ,Interdisciplinary ,Team ,Work ,Essay

Assignment #2

APA requirements (be sure to download d2l APA resources to guide your in-text citing and reference page formatting):

Activity #1 – one in-text citation, included in properly formatted reference page

Activity #2 – one in-text citation, included in properly formatted reference page

Activity #1:

Read this article:Nancarrow, S. A., Booth, A., Ariss, S., Smith, T., Enderby, P., & Roots, A. (2013). Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work (on d2l).

Given what you have learned about interdisciplinary team work (IDT), provide your interpretation of what an IDT is and what is required for a successful IDT. Discuss what your intended career might be in the helping professions, what people/groups you will serve, and what other professions might be included in your IDT.

Write your focused paragraph here, with in-text citation:

Activity #2:

Navigate to the Institute for Health’s “The Conversation Project” and familiarize yourself with its intent.

Follow this link to download and/or print your “Conversation Starter Kit”.

Read through the Starter Kit, and select one person in your life with whom you would like to have an end-of-life care conversation.

Complete your Starter Kit and keep it in a safe location. This is for your personal use and planning.

Take the next step toward having the conversation.

Write a 1-2 paragraph reflective summary of your thoughts, feelings, perceptions, experience, etc. You do not have to discuss anything that you prefer not to share in an academic setting. However, be specific enough to demonstrate you completed the steps, while articulating your insights, awareness, and critical thought on the topic.Be assured that your privacy is secure, and that you are sincerely supported and valued as you engage in an activity that is uncomfortable for many people . . .which is why The Conversation Project is an essential tool to assist us in navigating conversations centering on end-of-life preferences, issues, and concerns.

Is there anyone that you would like to send this Conversation Project Starter Kit to?If so, please do so.

To earn credit for this activity:

Talk to one family member or friend about The Conversation Project.

Often times, students feel they are ‘too young’ to have The Conversation regarding their own personal decisions. If you’re not ready to do so at this time, have the conversation with a loved one. For example, you may wish to initiate this conversation with an older family member or friend. You may choose to have them complete the Starter Kit, if they haven’t done so already. What are their wishes? Have the conversation with them, regarding their preferences.
Alternatively, you may wish to have the conversation regarding your wisheswith a loved one.

Having the conversation may reveal that you and your loved ones disagree. That’s okay. It’s important to simply know this, and to continue talking about it now—not during a medical crisis. Having the conversation isn’t just a one-time thing. It’s the first in a series of conversations over time.

[Order Now]

CHS 305 Interdisciplinary Team Work Essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.