PHILO 40  Essay Question Options

PHILO 40  Essay Question Options

Instructions/Descriptions

PHILO 40  Essay Question Options

[Order Now]

Before working on the essay assignment, read the following items: (1) the essay assignment description and schedule in

the syllabus; (2) the assigned reading materials pertaining to the question option you choose; (3) the detailed

assignment instructions found in the “How to Successfully Complete the PHILO 40 Essay Assignment” coursework guide;

and (4) each part and sub-part of the question options below. Note: 1, 2, & 3 are located on the Canvas class site.

There are three question options below. Choose one of the following options for the focus of your essay:

Option 1: My General Ethical Principle

In the introduction portion of the course, we examined several theories used to guide ethical behavior. If you choose

option 1, your essay will explore your own guiding code or principle of ethical behavior. There are two main parts to

option 1:

Part 1: Your Principle of Ethical Behavior: In part one, explain the code or principle that you typically use to make

ethical decisions about your interpersonal interactions. Your principle might be a general principle like a “golden

rule” or a “GHP;” or it might be as simple as “respectful action” or “compassionate care.” Either way, make sure to

explain the following components of the principle:

(a) Outline the key features of your principle of ethical behavior: Explain the fundamental features make this

principle what it is, and not something else.

For example, if your principle is “treat others the way you…,” start by explaining what you mean by

“treatment.” Then, go on to explain who is included in the category of “you” and who is included in the

category of “others.” Then, be sure to clarify the “way” of treatment that unfolds between “you” to the

“others.”

(b) Explain what makes your principle an ethical principle of behavior, rather than a non-ethical principle of

behavior (e.g. act the way that makes you happy or act the way you feel, both being examples of non-ethical

principles).

Note: you will need to complete the “Introduction to the Fundamentals of Philosophical Ethics” readings

to adequately address this portion of the question.

Part 2: Its Interpersonal Interactive Application: In part two, use an example to demonstrate your general principle

of ethical behavior in-action. You may want to apply your principle to one of the topics we are discussing in the

course – the ethics of poverty, non-human animal ethics, or environmental ethics; or you may want to apply it to a

more personal “everyday” context, like a parenting exchange, or an interpersonal interaction involving your future

career. Either way, make sure you clarify your example by addressing the following sub-parts:

(a) Inform the reader of the situation you are addressing and explicitly explain what makes this situation an

“ethical context,” rather than a non-ethical context.

In answering this sub-part, be sure you explain the who, what, how, and why elements of the situation,

as they relate to ethical engagement.

(b) Critically explain how your general ethical principle applies to a specific action unfolding in the situation.

Here, you will need to explain the way a specific (inter-)action fits with your principle of ethical behavior. In so

doing, you will need to address the relationship between your principle (outlined in part 1a) and the

interpersonal-interactive elements of the situation you are describing (outlined in part 2a). Remember:

(i) specific examples illustrate better than do general examples; and

(ii) your ethical principle is “principled” – meaning, it equally applies to all involved in the interactive

exchange – actors and recipients alike. With this being the case, you need to explain how the principle

applies to the interactive actions of all the actors involved in the situation.

Page 2 of 2

Option 2: My Ethics of Poverty

Option 2 explores the ethical implications of poverty. If you choose option 2, your explanation will contain two main

parts:

Part 1: What is Poverty? In part one, describe both the essence and effects of poverty. Here, you will explain:

(a) your definition of poverty: What is your definition of poverty, not the dictionaries’, or some other source’s

definition? In providing the reader with your definition, explain what makes your definition of poverty what it is

and not something else. To do so, you must identify and explain its fundamental features.

(b) the reasons for poverty: Why does poverty (as described in 1a) exist? What are its main causes?

(c) the effects of poverty: What results from “poverty” and its causes (as described in 1b)?

Part 2: Poverty and Ethical Responsibility: In part two, identify and explain the ethical responsibilities we have to

address the reasons for, and effects of, poverty? Here, you will explain:

(a) ethical responsibility: What is an ethical obligation? How is it different from a legal, political, or religious

obligation? Note: you will need to complete the “Introduction to the Fundamentals of Philosophical Ethics”

readings to adequately address this portion of the question.

(b) the ethical responsibilities of the communal group: What ethical obligation(s) does the communal group, as

a whole, have toward the impoverished? What specific ethical actions should the group pursue to help alleviate

the reasons for, and effects of, poverty?

(c) the ethical responsibilities of individuals like you or me: How should individuals, help the impoverished?

What specific ethical actions should you pursue to help alleviate the reasons for, and effects of, poverty?

Option 3: My Approach to Non-Human-Animal Ethics

Option 3 explores philosophical ethics as it applies to non-human-animal entities. If you choose option 3, your

explanation will contain two main parts:

Part 1: What is an Ethical Entity? Describe what makes an “entity,” an “ethical entity” (i.e. one deserving of ethical

consideration). In part one, you will explain:

(a) your description of “ethics:” What is “philosophical ethics?” Explain what it is, who it involves, and how it

involves them? Note: you will need to complete the “Introduction to the Fundamentals of Philosophical Ethics”

readings to adequately address this portion of the question.

(b) your definition of “entity:” What is an “entity?” What characteristics makes something an “entity?”

(c) your definition of an “ethical-entity:” How do “ethics” (part 1a) and “entity” (part 1b) connect in “ethicalentity” (part 1c)? What characteristics makes an entity, an “ethical entity?”

Part 2: Non-Human-Animals and Ethical Consideration: Describe the ethical implications of your part 1c argument.

What ethical responsibilities do we have toward non-human-animals? In part two, you will explain:

(a) your description of “non-human-animal:” What makes a “non-human-animal” what it is and not something

else? What are the fundamental characteristics of a “non-human-animal?” How are they similar/dissimilar from

“human animals?”

[Order Now]

(b) which “non-human-animals” (part 2a) are “ethical-entities” (part 1c) and, therefore, deserve ethical

consideration: What distinguishes “non-human-animals” from mere “things” or “objects?” Explain the

characteristics they possess that makes them “some-ones” rather than “some-things.”

(c) the practical implications of your part 2b argument: What practical implications does this argument have on

your personal interactions with non-human-animals? Use an “everyday” example from your life to clarify your

part 2c argument.

PHILO 40  Essay Question Options

RUBRIC Excellent Quality 95-100%   Introduction 45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Literature Support 91-84  points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Methodology 58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. Average Score 50-85% 40-38 points More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. 83-76  points There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. 52-49  points The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Poor Quality 0-45% 37-1 points The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. 75-1 points There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. 48-1 points There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. PHILO 40  Essay Question Options Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/

PHILO 40  Essay Question Options

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!