Algorithms Or Flow Maps Methodology and Design

December 14, 2022

Algorithms Or Flow Maps Methodology and Design

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Algorithms Or Flow Maps Methodology and Design

Algorithms, Flow, Maps, Methodology, Design

Please see attached phase 1 paper so you follow the same topic

Your paper will be at least five to six pages (strict adherence to APA guidelines is required). Additionally, class, I will be looking for the quality of your writing, not the quantity. Your writings should be concise, factual and disseminates information.

We will commence as follows:

Brief literature review

algorithms or flow maps Methodology and design of the study (Please be detailed-oriented as possible)

Sampling Methodology

Necessary tools that will be incorporated into your paper

Any algorithms or flow maps that you may create (illustrations)

Please pay very close attention to the requirements of the grading rubric. Remember that you want to keep your similarity scores at 20% or below and we will continue to implement the writing and formatting standards associated with APA 6^th edition. Currently, we are not utilizing the 7^th edition of APA.

	Outstanding 4 points	Very Good 3 points	Good 2 Points	Unacceptable 1 point
Integration of Knowledge 12.5%	The paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas	The paper demonstrates that the author, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper	The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course	The paper does not demonstrate that the author has fully understood, and applied concepts learned in the course.
Topic Focus 12.5%	The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by a statement of a position or hypothesis	The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic but the writer has not established a position.	The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.	The topic is not clearly defined
Depth of Discussion 12.5 %	In-depth discussion and elaboration in all sections of the paper.	In-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper.	The writer has omitted pertinent content. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively.	Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections
Cohesiveness 12.5%	Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next without the need for headings. Author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources	For the most part, it ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.	Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow. Disjointedness is apparent. The author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.	It does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationship
Spelling and Grammar 12.5%	Minimal spelling and/or grammar mistakes	Some spelling and or grammar mistakes.	Noticeable spelling and grammar mistakes.	An unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes
Sources 12.5%	More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature and acknowledged as such if they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative.	5 current sources, of which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are authoritative.	Fewer than 5 current sources or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are credible.	Fewer than 5 current sources or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all web sites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current.
Citations 12.5%	Cites all data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography	Cites most data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography.	Cites some data obtained from other sources. The citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect.	It does not cite s

[Order Now]

Algorithms Or Flow Maps Methodology and Design

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.