Your preferred leadership theory short paper

January 24, 2023

Your preferred leadership theory short paper

Order Number	6525337435742735
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Your preferred leadership theory short paper

The way you think about leadership influences how you practice leadership. Scholars have struggled for years to define ‘leadership’. Those definitions and our thoughts about leadership have evolved greatly over time and consequently, leadership means different things to different people. Some consider leadership as evidenced by the presence of certain traits, specific abilities, or even a particular set of skills. Others look at specific behaviors the leader demonstrates or they view leadership as a relationship or a process between the leader and followers. These are all viable, but different theoretical approaches to defining leadership. Realizing that leadership can be thought of in different ways (trait, ability, skill, behavior, relationship, and/or process), this leadership questionnaire helps to ferret out your preference, if you have one. To see how leadership is practiced and to answer the question ‘what is leadership?’, complete the assessment Conceptualizing Leadership Questionnaire. For this assignment: Complete the Conceptualizing Leadership Questionnaire . Analyze your results and prepare a short paper responding to the questions below. Describe your view leadership based on the results of this questionnaire. Include your scores for all of the theories. Describe the theory/theories which you scored the highest. How does this particular theory connect with how you view leadership? ( Must quote/paraphrase the text and include the citation) Describe one of the theories where you scored lower. Discuss how this particular theory does not resonate with your view of leadership. ( Must quote/paraphrase the text and include the citation) In one sentence provide your working definition of leadership. Begin with ‘Leadership is….. Your response should include direct reference to the text by describing the theories you discuss. Do so by direct quote or paraphrase and include the reference citation and (Northouse, p.22) or what ever page your cite. If you do not have the text, find another source preferably Northouse and use it for this assignment. Number your responses. Be sure to support your answers using concepts (citations) from the text or other sources. Limit your response to 1000 words, double spaced, use Times New Roman, font size 12, include your name and submit your assignment below. Link all responses to the text citing the referenced page. Of course, papers should be organized, thorough, with proper sentence structure and grammar.

[Order Now]

Your preferred leadership theory short paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.