Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Debate on reparations and the social justice movement:
First, refer to each of the following:
* “The Legacy of Slavery” section on page 166 of our textbook, chapter 7, where the author discusses slavery reparations. (The issue of apologies and financial compensation is also discussed briefly on page 294 with respect to Japanese-American internment in US concentration camps during World War II.)
* The bill, H.R. 40: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/40
* Coates’s article that is required for this week on “The Case for Reparations”
Question for debate and discussion: Considering the deep and lasting impact of slavery on widespread institutionalized discrimination –in wealth accumulation, housing, education, medicine, politics, and more–what do you think about the call for reparations? Assess the pros and cons, as well as possible alternatives. You can be creative with this one, and don’t hesitate to disagree. We can learn from disagreement.3 attachments
Debate on reparations and the social justice movement:
First, refer to each of the following:
* “The Legacy of Slavery” section on page 166 of our textbook, chapter 7, where the author discusses slavery reparations. (The issue of apologies and financial compensation is also discussed briefly on page 294 with respect to Japanese-American internment in US concentration camps during World War II.)
* The bill, H.R. 40: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/40
* Coates’s article that is required for this week on “The Case for Reparations”
Question for debate and discussion: Considering the deep and lasting impact of slavery on widespread institutionalized discrimination –in wealth accumulation, housing, education, medicine, politics, and more–what do you think about the call for reparations? Assess the pros and cons, as well as possible alternatives. You can be creative with this one, and don’t hesitate to disagree. We can learn from disagreement.3 attachments
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/