Writing Bullying discussion post

December 20, 2022

Writing Bullying discussion post

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Description

This for a discussion post. It has to include at least 2 of the sources provided(links included). One statistic has to be provided in the writing as well. It has to be 300 words. Prior to completing this discussion,

please read Section 15.5 in your textbook and the Parental Characteristics Associated with Bullying Perpetration in US Children Aged 10 to 17 Years (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3519332/pdf/AJPH.2012.300725.pdf) article, and watch the Bullying exerts psychiatric effects into adulthood (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aHTHGjQ628&feature=youtube_gdata) Also, review the information from Chapter 1 about Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory and the Understanding Bullying (http://content.nps.k12.nj.us/SCI/wp-content/uploads/sites/67/2017/10/Understanding-Bullying-2016-CDC-Fact-Sheet-2.pdf) fact sheet from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention site.

At least two of these sources should be cited in your original post. Utilize Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory to address the topic of motivations for and influences on bullying. In your initial post of a minimum of 300 words, complete the following:

1) Using each of the five systems in Bronfenbrenner’s theory, describe how a child’s environment (including family, school, and community) might predispose the child to bullying. For example, within a person’s microsystem are the parents. How might parents be an influencing factor on whether or not a child is prone to bullying?

2) Find and report (with proper citation) one current statistic on the factors influencing school bullying behaviors. Does this statistic seem to follow the same trend supported by Bronfenbrenner’s theory? If not, explain how it challenges the theory.

3) Finally, provide one unique solution to reduce or completely end bullying.

Writing Bullying discussion post

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.