Wring Discrimination Argumentative essay

December 21, 2022

Wring Discrimination Argumentative essay

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Wring Discrimination Argumentative essay

[Order Now]

Type of paper:Argumentative essay

Discipline:English and Literature : English

Format or citation style:MLA

Paper instructions:: Using the three resources that i uploaded to the additional materials i need an argumentative essay about discrimination following this instructions Researched Argument

In this essay, you will make a well-researched and well-articulated argument proposing how social media should be used to effect change (or maybe how we should change or eliminate some social media technology to effect a desired change). Topics you can consider include (but are not limited to):

The environment
Income inequality
Personal privacy
Education
Discrimination
“Fake News”
Civility
You will submit your topic proposal on a discussion board and receive feedback and approval.

Your essay should have a thesis that clearly states how you think a specific technology is impacting a particular issue. You should cite at least three reliable sources to support your argument.

In this essay, you will be defining a problem and arguing its solution. Make sure that you are able to see all sides of the issue—not just yours. Seeing other sides of the issue is crucial in this kind of paper.
You need to gather evidence to prove that it is indeed a significant problem that has not been resolved. You’ll also want information that will help argue your solution.
Here’s a good outline for the essay:
Discussion of the problem: show all sides, demonstrate that it is a major problem worth solving and that it is not easily or quickly solved.
Discussion of solutions that haven’t or won’t work and why
Discussion of your proposed solution: its merits, feasibility, and specific implementation process
Call to action
To get a passing grade, this essay must:
Be written per MLA style with at least 3 sources cited in MLA format in the text of the essay and listed on a works-cited page.
Use sources that actually advance your ethos. Don’t just use the source easiest to find.
Be 4-5 pages not including the works-cited page (at least 4 full pages of text).
Avoid fallacies, 1st person singular pronouns (I, me, my, mine), and second person pronouns (you, your, yours)
Include logical, emotional, and ethical appeals as needed.
Be well constructed and organized.
Avoid misdocumented and undocumented plagiarism.
The peer review draft should include the problem discussion and a discussion of solutions that haven’t or won’t work. You may also want to broach the subject of your solution here so as to get some extra critiques on this part. This draft should be at least three pages.

[Order Now]

Wring Discrimination Argumentative essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.