Workplace Discrimination

Order Number	64356877627562426
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Your research paper for this class will focus on a claim of policy of your choosing. A claim of policy argues that a certain problem exists and there is a needed solution for it.The purpose of the paper is to select a claim of policy, preferably one that impacts you personally, to either argue for or against. The choice can be an existing policy or one that you believe should exist.

This paper requires you to synthesize a variety of sources into a coherent, well-written essay. Synthesis refers to combining sources and your position to form a cohesive, well supported argument and accurately citing sources. Your argument should be central; the sources should support this argument. Avoid merely summarizing sources. Explain as specifically as possible what you want your audience to think and how they should be persuaded when you argue your claim of policy.

I encourage you to take the time to critically think about the laws and policies that affect you and are worth arguing about. The topics below, although not simplistic, are often immediately selected argument wise. As such, ideally they should not be your first choice because I’d like to encourage you to dig deeper to tap into your curiosity and critical thinking skills. However, should you wish to explore them, you must have a very clear and focused research question.

Important stuff to remember about writing arguments

Reflect about what you learned about claims of policy and rhetorical analysis. As part of your argument you are required to provide factual evidence that supports your policy. This means that you have to look at the subject matter from every angle possible and make an informed decision. When advocating for or against the policy, then you have to provide sustaining examples as to why your policy is the right choice, or not. Consequently, you have to be well informed –meaning your ethos as a writer is front and center– about the policy that you are advocating for and provide relevant examples to persuade your reader.

Outline options

Decide which argument essay organizations pattern you want to use for this essay, then submit your outline for review.

Defending the Thesis
Refuting an Opposing View
Finding the Middle Ground
Presenting the Stock Issue

* i choose #1 Defending the Thesis

Grading Criteria:

MLA format
Essay should have all the writing elements discussed during lectures:
Engaging introduction
Thesis Statement (subject + 3 Supporting Evidences)
Balanced paragraphs that don’t exceed half a page in length
Topic sentences
Transition words and sentences
Organized thoughts and clear examples
In-texting for credit purposes
Attention to grammar and sentence structure
Pay attention to the number of quotes used –meaning use wisely and sparingly!
Works Cited page
Written in third person (avoid I, you, your, we, us, myself, yourself ect.)
Plagiarized papers will receive an automatic failing grade

Sources

For this you will need a minimum of 5 credible sources:

A minimum of TWO must be scholarly articles from the ECC Library Database.

THE REST must be from credible sources –avoid articles from sites that do not enlist an author or are not considered credible.

Important stuff to remember about writing arguments

Reflect about what you learned about claims of policy and rhetorical analysis. As part of your argument you are required to provide factual evidence that supports your policy. This means that you have to look at the subject matter from every angle possible and make an informed decision. When advocating for or against the policy, then you have to provide sustaining examples as to why your policy is the right choice, or not. Consequently, you have to be well informed –meaning your ethos as a writer is front and center– about the policy that you are advocating for and provide relevant examples to persuade your reader.

[Order Now]

Workplace Discrimination

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.