WOMEN OF COLOR IN PSYCHOLOGY

January 9, 2023

WOMEN OF COLOR IN PSYCHOLOGY

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

WOMEN OF COLOR IN PSYCHOLOGY

WOMEN OF COLOR IN PSYCHOLOGY In the Unit One materials you were asked to review a timeline of contributions by women of color within the field of psychology. I indicated that you should be prepared to identify at least one person who you found compelling and explain why.

This is an extra credit assignment that encourages broadening our understanding of those who have and continue to contribute and shape the field of psychology. What to Do Identify the name of the person you have chosen and explain why you made that selection. DO NOT simply repeat the contributions identified in the link.

Summarize key contributions that stood out for you in your own words and share what led you to select this person to write about. What about her contribution was compelling to you? Did reading this timeline of contributors affect your perception of psychology? Why or why not? How can we use the experiences of pioneers to inform our current understanding of the field? At the end of your entry please put your name. How to make a post:

[Order Now]

WOMEN OF COLOR IN PSYCHOLOGY

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.