Women Gender Equality and Empowerment Analysis Essay

November 29, 2022

Women Gender Equality and Empowerment Analysis Essay

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Women Gender Equality and Empowerment Analysis Essay

[Order Now]

For this assignment, you will write a rhetorical analysis essay (5 pages, double spaced, 12 point, Roman font) analyzing a strategy that a person or text uses to accomplish social change. In this essay, you will identify and analyze a rhetorical strategy that a person or text used to accomplish social change. You should provide context for the person or text you are analyzing, pull specific examples and quotes showcasing the rhetorical strategy you have identified, and explain why that rhetorical strategy was effective and how it might be used by other activist writers. All research should be documented using MLA or APA citation style. You should use 2+ readings from Unit 2 in your essay.

If you’re lost on organization, I recommend this approach: introduce the text, author(s), audience, purpose, and context (whatever is going on when the text is written) in the introduction paragraph. In the next paragraph, define the rhetorical strategy you’re going to analyze. After that, include several body paragraphs that analyze specific examples of that rhetorical strategy in your text. Then, conclude by emphasizing the significance of the rhetorical strategy (what can other social change writers learn from it?). This isn’t a required organization to do well; it’s just a suggestion to help you if you’re feeling lost.

[Order Now]

Remember to use TWO unit 2 readings in your essay; if you incorporate additional research, make sure that research is relevant and credible and clearly cited in the essay and in the works cited list.

Make sure to FOCUS. Focus on one text and one specific rhetorical strategy. Don’t try to analyze all the appeals to ethos, pathos, and logos. Go for depth not breadth.

Please use this text (Bayeh, E. (2016). The role of empowering women and achieving gender equality to the sustainable development of Ethiopia. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 37-42.) to identify and analyze a rhetorical strategy and find a connection between the Readings we have covered in this Section. Those readings have been posted or attached below.

(8) CRIP CAMP: A DISABILITY REVOLUTION | Full Feature | Netflix – YouTube

The Obesity Epidemic (buzzsprout.com)

Women Gender Equality and Empowerment Analysis Essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.