Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
1-Watch the video and reply to the discussion prompts
2-Your reply to each prompt must be at least 100 words in length
–
1-The title of the video is “Schemas – Why You Need to Know About Them.” How would you explain to parents that understanding schemas can help them be better parents? ( 100 words minimum)
2-In the video, the statement is made that a parent thought a child was being “naughty” when the child was actually just demonstrating a behavior that all children are motivated to engage in because the behavior helps their intellectual development. In your opinion, to what extent is lack of understanding of normal child development a factor in child abuse and neglect? (100 words minimum)
—————————————————————————————————
3-write a reply for this comment (100 words minimum).
here is some answers samples:1.The way I would explain to parents that understanding schemas can help them be a better parent is by telling them that if they. understand their child schemas they can have a better understanding on why their child is acting a certain way. Instead of disciplining the child or yelling at them to stop doing a certain action they can research which schema their child is displaying and support their schema. I would also tell them that schemas will change over time and that their child may have a different schema every other week and that they have to pay close attention to their child so that they can know what to do or how to react.2.In my opinion, if a parent does not know anything about child development or is lacking information about their Childs development I would not consider it child abuse or neglect because they are just lacking information. If a parent was to research why their child is acting a certain way or if they study why their child is acting a certain why it would simply fix the parent lacking information and it would fix the way that the child is acting in a positive way.
Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/