Why Invest in Virtualization

January 24, 2023

Why Invest in Virtualization

Order Number	675472583763563
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Why Invest in Virtualization

M01 – Part 2: Assignment – Why Invest In Virtualization

Pretend that you have been tasked with presenting to a Board of Trustees at a business of your choice on why you believe they should or should not invest in virtualization software. You must research the pros and cons that virtualization would offer the company and create a report highlighting any important features that only virtualization may offer. This assignment should enlighten the board as to whether or not you believe virtualization would be a worthwhile project to explore further. You will need to write up your findings in a formal report format just like you would be presenting your research to the board. You will be using the results of this assignment in the discussion in this module, so you should have this assignment completed early in the week to meet the discussion deadline of the third day of the week.

M01 – Part 2: Discussion – Why Invest in Virtualization

Discussion Topic

For this discussion you will need to complete the M01 – Part 2: Why Should We Invest In Virtualization Assignment. After you have completed your assignment, you should craft a post here that covers the top 2 or 3 key reasons why a business should or should not invest in virtualization. You should be sure that you do more than state your results, include information to back up your position in your post using the information that you did in your research for the assignment above.

[Order Now]

Why Invest in Virtualization

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.