Why Do Some Managers Hate the Performance Evaluation?

January 10, 2023

Why Do Some Managers Hate the Performance Evaluation?

Order Number	657967523963
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Why Do Some Managers Hate the Performance Evaluation?

Hide Assignment Information Turnitin™ Turnitin™ enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™. Instructions Week 6 Paper Topic: Why Do Some Managers Hate the Performance Evaluation? Some managers would rather get a root canal than go through the performance evaluation process with their direct reports. Why? What does research tell you? As you respond to the two questions listed above, please address the following: What traits does an effective manager display in the workplace? Is there a profile for a manager who may struggle with the evaluation process? What are the key elements of a successful employee evaluation process? How should a manager prepare for the event? Develop an evaluation form for your direct reports and show how the evaluation criterion correlates to the organization’s objectives. Directions: The assignment should be between 4-6 pages which include the cover page and reference page. Your paper should include an introduction and conclusion that summarize the contents of the entire paper. Your paper should be written in proper APA format. References: A minimum of two references are required for this assignment. You may use your textbook as a reference in addition to the two references. Due Date

[Order Now]

Why Do Some Managers Hate the Performance Evaluation?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.