When is Iatrogenic Harm Negligent

January 7, 2023

When is Iatrogenic Harm Negligent

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

When is Iatrogenic Harm Negligent

Significant plagiarism or cheating can result in you failing the course. If I am unsure that you have written your own paper I will require a Zoom meeting with you where you will need to explain both the ideas of the paper and how you wrote the paper. Until I am satisfied it is your own work, you will get a 0 grade.

Citation: I prefer APA format but you can use another if you prefer. The main point is for it to be crystal clear where your citations come from. You do not need a cover page, keywords, or an abstract. Font and font size: I prefer size 12 font in Times New Roman, double-spaced.

But the main aim is for your paper to be easy to read.

Task: You need to answer one of the questions below. Your goal is to state a main claim that gives an answer to the question. Show how the claim answers the question in detail and justify your claim as much as you can. Consider and answer opposing views. You can use material from the textbook, the slides, the useful links, or your own research In order to get an A, you need to do research from scholarly sources and include a discussion of the research in your paper. Advice for paper writing A grading rubric will be provided.

Here is a rough guide. C grade: 1700+ words of thoughtful work. B grade: 2000+ words of thoughtful work with discussion and use of main chapter material in the textbook. A grade: 2700+ words of thoughtful work with a discussion of one of the papers at the end of the textbook chapters, or an external scholarly source.

Answer question: This article When Is Iatrogenic Harm Negligent? | Journal of Ethics | American Medical Association was one of the most-read medical ethics articles of 2022. Summarize the main issues it raises, discuss some of the background issues, and then discuss the particular claims it makes.

Based off of this article :

https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/when-iatrogenic-harm-negligent/2022-08

[Order Now]

When is Iatrogenic Harm Negligent

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.