Week 8 Training and Development Discussion Question

November 25, 2022

Week 8 Training and Development Discussion Question

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Week 8, Training, and, Development, Discussion, Question

[Order Now]

Read chapter 7 OF THE TEXTBOOK and make an open ended question based off of reading chapter 7.

Chapter 7 – Training and Development

After coming up with an open ended question, write a description of what’s your logic behind it.

Make sure the question is OPEN ENDED!

THE DECRIPTION SHOULD BE 200 WORDS.

TEXTBOOK IS ATTACHED BELOW.

DO NOT COPY PASTE FROM TEXTBOOK. DO NOT PLAGARIZE. OUTSIDE SOURCE MAY BE USED MAKE SURE TO PROVIDE LINK.

Second PART: reply to 2 people, it should be 150+ words for each. Reply to these two discussion posts. They both have different question they have answered. Reply if you agree with there decription for the question and/or your thoughts.

Should general organization training be replaced with team training?

When an employee joins an organization, they have to go through a general training. For example, for software engineering position, the employee is taught about different technologies that the organization uses, basic everyday workflow, etc.

Those trainings are very important to give the new hire an overview of the work culture and basic tasks in the company. But a lot of the time, when the employee officially joins a team, they will receive another training from the team about team specific workflow, tasks, technologies, which can be completely different from the general organizational training. This seems like the general training is a waste of time and resource if a what the team needs are different from the organization.

In that situation, should the company keeps the general training? Or remove it and replace with training from the team that the new hire joins?

Source: https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/different-types-of-workplace-training

Have you ever been required to participate in training that did not do what the your place of employment, boss, school, thought it would?

I worked at a large corporation over the summer and every Monday I had to complete online training that took about 30 minutes. My job duties required me to be outside helping customers, down stocking, spotting people using lift machines etcetera. One of my coworkers expressed how the training we are required to do isn’t really all that beneficial. It just seemed like something the company was doing just to say that they do it. She expressed how we are expected to be out doing our actual job duties, but instead we become sidetracked to perform work training that doesn’t seem like it transfers over. I felt like the learned more about how to be the “best customer service employee” by actually working-not by watching videos…

Source: https://hbr.org/2019/10/where-companies-go-wrong-with-learning-and-development

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Week 8 Training and Development Discussion Question

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.