Virginia Tech Juvenile Delinquency Project Discussion

November 29, 2022

Virginia Tech Juvenile Delinquency Project Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Virginia Tech Juvenile Delinquency Project Discussion

[Order Now]

I’m working on a sociology discussion question and need a sample draft to help me learn.

Please read Ch. 12 this week (which will get you ahead of your readings for your assignment due next week) on the role of policing and whether this has any impact on juvenile delinquency rates. Some might argue that the police should serve the role as crime fighters (in current time there is much discussion about “law and order”) but it is not their role to actively work to prevent juvenile delinquency, as that responsibility should reside with families, schools, community organizations, and even the court system.

1. In your opinion, what role, if any, should police organizations take in delinquency prevention?

2. Should police departments have some responsibility in actively providing delinquency control strategies in their communities?

2. Could police organizations take on this type of responsibility? If so, how?

[Order Now]

Covid 19 and Social Interactions Discussion

I’m working on a sociology discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Name one rule that has changed due to Covid that a year ago would have been considered deviant. Explain why it would have been considered deviant before Covid, and how now the new rule is needed. Then explain how people who do not complying to the new rule are reacted to in the Formal and Informal realms of Social Control.

Virginia Tech Juvenile Delinquency Project Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.