Virginia Tech Beware of the Slenderman Essay Discussion

November 29, 2022

Virginia Tech Beware of the Slenderman Essay Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Virginia Tech Beware of the Slenderman Essay Discussion

[Order Now]

I’m working on a sociology discussion question and need a sample draft to help me learn.

How can we apply some of the ideas of differential association to the case discussed in “Beware of the Slenderman?”

How can we apply some of the ideas of social learning theory to the case discussed in “Beware of the Slenderman?”

What do you think could have been done to prevent this from occurring? Do you think it could have been prevented? What most facilitated this incident? Is the media/wide spread access to the type of material the girls were looking at in any way to blame?

[Order Now]

Juvenile Delinquency Discussion

I’m working on a sociology discussion question and need a sample draft to help me learn.

Do public campaigns and drug abuse education programs actually result in lower rates of teen drug abuse? Consider the effectiveness of the 1990s DARE campaign…

Do some research on “The Meth Project” – this project took a very aggressive and graphic campaign to billboards, radio, and television about the dangers of meth use, with the tag line “Not Even Once”

The target age group of the Meth Project is 12-18 year old students…in your opinion, do you believe this campaign has been effective?

Virginia Tech Beware of the Slenderman Essay Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.