Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
10/25/22, 12:25 PM Case 2: Write Up
https://canvas.pdx.edu/courses/57280/assignments/578113?module_item_id=2774126 1/3
Case 2: Write Up
Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 100 Submitting a text entry box, a website url, or a file upload
Available Oct 17 at 12am – Oct 30 at 11:59pm
Case Analysis Grading Rubric
Start Assignment
Hi everyone. Case Write-Ups require the following:
Follow the Case Study Rubric (Executive Summary, Problem Statement, Analysis, Options, and Recommendations)
Case Write-Up Length: 5-7 pages
Please submit Cases in CANVAS (only one submission per group).
Case Questions (see below):
The responses to the Cases Questions should be written after the write-up has been completed.
Case 2: Padhy Leather: Minimizing Commercial Risk Through a Letter of Credit
Describe the dilemmas or concerns of Buyers/Importers and Sellers/Exporters in International Trade
Explain the various payment options available in international business, and their relative merits and demerits for
exporters and importers.
Explain the various risks in international trade. Identify risks that are common in domestic trade and risks that are
unique to international trade. Explain the methods for managing these risks.
Explain the concept and mechanics of a DLC (Documentary Letter of Credit) and its applications in international
business. How does a DLC work as a credit enhancement device for importers and a credit risk mitigating tool for
exporters?
10/25/22, 12:25 PM Case 2: Write Up
https://canvas.pdx.edu/courses/57280/assignments/578113?module_item_id=2774126 2/3
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/