Vampire Falls Be Found Liable Edward Case Study

December 2, 2022

Vampire Falls Be Found Liable Edward Case Study

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Vampire Falls Be Found Liable Edward Case Study

[Order Now]

Edward was employed as a laborer by Vampire Falls. On May 5, 2010, Edward was sent to the Vampire Falls Cemetery and instructed to install a row of headstones along the property line between the Town Park and the neighboring property, owned by Bella. Edward went to the Town Park and began to dig holes for the headstones along the line he believed was the line between the properties, relying on stakes that were erroneously placed by Vampire Falls on Bella’s property. After he had dug several holes, Bella came out of her house, advised Edward that he was digging on her property, and ordered him to leave. Edward became enraged and swung his shovel at Bella, narrowly missing her head. Frightened that Edward would strike her, Bella turned to run away, tripped and broke her ankle. On October 5, 2010, Bella, by her attorney, commenced an action against Vampire Falls and Edward, alleging a cause of action in trespass, seeking damages for the cost of restoring and reseeding her property, and a cause of action for assault, seeking damages for pain and suffering due to her broken ankle.

On what theory could Vampire Falls be found liable? Discuss

Business Law Questions Discussion

In today’s economy, there are a wide number of powerful companies who in all appearances control massive segments of different markets. Using the Legal Research Tool (below) identify a case example of Horizontal restraint of trade and one of Vertical restraint of trade in the last two years. Be sure to identify the facts, the parties, the law and explain the trade restraint and court decision.

[Order Now]

The most powerful incentive for compliance with anti-trust laws include penalties and remedies. Summarize these penalties and remedies per the text reading and, provide your thoughts as to the article link shown. In other words, do you agree with the premise of the article and would the breakup of the companies identified help or hurt the economy today? https://www.inc.com/alex-moazed/why-modern-monopolies-are-good.html

https://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://www.nexisuni.com

Please substantiate and follow SWS requirements for citing sources and provide for sources and research used.

Vampire Falls Be Found Liable Edward Case Study

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.