Order Number |
346547092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
scussion 2: Capstone Forum: Assignment With Peer Review: Evaluation of the Mission, Vision, and Values of an Organization: The Soulful Purpose in Action
This week, you begin to build your Strategy Playbook for your chosen Capstone organization. You will begin this process by evaluating what Wolfe calls the “Context Field,” or level of analysis, of the organization. As Wolfe explains (2011, pp. 81–84):
Within organizations, the Context field is often incorrectly referred to as the culture of the organization. It is this but is also much more . Culture is part of Context but not all of it.
Context is certainly much more than the “do’s and don’ts” we associate with the word culture in our society. It’s even more than the mores and shared values we spend so much time dissecting and diagramming. It’s the sum total of all our shared stories, the mythology we make up to explain our world to ourselves and to others.
As such, it is not something that we can easily observe or measure but it literally defines “how we do things around here.” An organization and the individuals within it cannot behave or operate in ways that are contrary to the Context framework defining the organization. . .
The Context Field contains energy associated with meaning and purpose. It is the energy that drives what is known in today’s business environment as engagement.
In traditional strategy terms, evaluating the “Context Field” of an organization is related to the evaluation of the organization’s stated, and lived, mission, vision, and values (if they have them stated). The analysis of the Context Field derives from developing answers to a probing set of questions that are intended to help you better understand the goals, ambitions, values, and long-term soulful purpose of the organization. Understanding these issues sets the context and lens from which to better understand how to shape your Strategy Playbook when you complete later analyses in the course. It also affords you the opportunity to recommend ways in which these important context elements (mission, vision and values) could be improved. This week’s focus question for your Strategy Playbook is, what is your winning aspiration? (What do you stand for and believe deeply in?)
To prepare for this Discussion:
By Day 5
Post a polished and synthesized evaluation of your chosen organization’s stated mission, vision, and values statements. At a minimum you should address:
Be sure to back your evaluation with evidence and with reference to best practices from the case study, required readings, and relevant readings from the Capstone Program Bibliography.
If the organization you are studying does not have formal mission, vision or value statements, create a draft of each, based on the application of your research and analysis of your company. Then explain why your version makes sense.
General Guidance: Your original Discussion post for the Capstone Forum will typically be 1 to 1 ½ single-spaced pages, excluding references. Refer to the Week 2 Discussion 2 rubric for grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use the rubric to assess your work.
Note: After you receive input from your colleagues, in the next few days you should revise your original post to reflect input that you think is helpful and strengthens your position. This final revised version from this week’s Capstone Forum will become the first formal entry into your Strategy Playbook appendix. Title this section “Mission, Vision, and Values Analysis for XYZ [Insert Organization Name],” and be sure to keep a version of your response in your Strategy Playbook template. As a best practice you should plan to review your playbook throughout the next 6 weeks as you continue to build your components. You may find that you have new ideas and items that further improve your work.