Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
A policy research paper has been assigned for this course. The policy research paper will critically analyze the practical applicability of a specific criminal justice policy.
Title Page: Include name, title of topic, course number, course name, and semester.
Problem Statement: State the policy that will be addressed and why this policy has been chosen for review.
Introduction: Provide a brief overview of your paper. The introduction serves a roadmap for your audience.
Policy Presentation: Research the policy/strategy/act so that your audience can be informed of the facts that led to the policy. Make sure that you clearly define the policy that you have selected. Provide the historical and legislative context of the policy. Be sure to include relevant facts that led to the policy since factual information adds credibility to your review. Facts will also support your proposed solution to the problem that the policy attempts to address.
Theoretical Influence: Discuss at least one theoretical assumption that influenced the implementation of the crime control policy/strategy/act that you have selected. Make sure that your review of the theory is thorough. In your discussion, be sure to include any counter arguments that were made against the theory that you have chosen.
Policy Critique: Begin your critique by stating the problem or benefit that this policy presents and how it affects all who are involved (e.g., the community, the offender, the victim and the criminal justice system).For example, if you believe that the policy/strategy/act is ineffective, state that. If you believe that the policy has been effective, state that. Be sure that you use data to support your rationale.
Proposed Solution: If you conclude that the policy has been ineffective, propose a solution(s) to address the problem that the policy sought to correct. If you conclude that the policy has been effective, propose means in which the policy can be enhanced. Make sure that you present research and facts that support your proposal (e.g., crime statistics, national or local crime events, other credible research, successful policies, political debate, etc.). Finally, state how your solutions or enhancements can be implemented.
Conclusion: Write a short conclusion. Keep your conclusion to a paragraph or two that summarizes all of the information you have stated and presented in your policy review.
References: Cite your sources using the APA format. Any factual information cited in your paper from other sources must be documented. The body of your paper must include in-text citations. All of the sources that you cited in the body of your paper must be provided in a separate reference page at the end of your paper. Again, please adhere to the APA format.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/