Use of Firewalls Discussion Assignment

December 9, 2022

Use of Firewalls Discussion Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Use of Firewalls Discussion Assignment

[Order Now]

Assume you are a security professional. You are determining which of firewall products on the market today best fits your organization’s needs. How would you go about deciding which firewall works best for your organization? Describe the select process. Identify 3 firewalls that are currently available and briefly describe whether each one would or would not fit your needs and why.

Create a new thread (by the FIRST DUE DATE)
How would you go about deciding which firewall works best for your organization?
Describe the select process.
Identify 3 firewalls that are currently available and briefly describe whether each one would or would not fit your needs and why.

I’m interested to read what YOU learned from this week’s reading. Do NOT submit a research paper. Tell me what you think.

Think of three questions you’d like to ask other students and add these to the end of your thread.
The questions must be taken from material you read in this week, and each question should start a discussion topic.
You’re not trying to test each other, but you are trying to start a discussion.
Finally, go to three other students’ threads and post comments, answering at least one of their questions.
For EACH comment you post, use the 3CQ approach
When someone asks you a question, answer it!

Requirements:

Sources: 2 References to Support your answer
Citation Style: APA format
Length: 2 – 3 paragraphs
Engagement: Respond to three other students’ question

ALL threads and comments must be substantive AND ORIGINAL. (I’m looking for about a paragraph – not just a short answer.) Do not plagiarize!! Use your own words.

Here is a description of the 3CQ model:

Compliment – Start off positive. Compliment the person on something specific you have read or observed in the person’s blog post. For example:

Thanks for sharing your thoughts! I really liked …

Comment – Comment on something relevant and meaningful about what the person wrote. Be specific! Remember your comment might not always be agreement. You can “politely” disagree. For example:

I agree with you about …
I respect your opinion, but I think …

[Order Now]

Connect – Connect with something the person wrote (Text-to-Self, Text-to-Text, Text-to-World). Explain your connection with details giving your audience a clear idea of what you’re talking about by using sensory details. For example:

I can connect with you about …
I once read a story about …
I had the same thing happen to me…

Question – Ask a specific question about something written or the writer. Keep the conversation going!

Use of Firewalls Discussion Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.