Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
This assignment is designed to helps students become familiar with aspects of socioeconomic inequality and the role social institutions and social structures play in perpetuating these inequalities. It addresses the fkl dimensions of critical thinking, inquiry-based learning, human and cultural diversity, and ethical perspectives. To complete this assignment please follow the steps below.
Step 1: Think critically about the readings, notes, and class discussions about stratification and structures of inequality.
Step 2: Explore the website www.playspent.org, an interactive web-based game that simulates the experiences of individuals trying to live “paycheck-to-paycheck.”
Run through the simulation and see how you fair. Document your journey, your decisions, your challenges, and your final outcome.
Step 3: Generate a report that summarizes your findings. Please include each of the sections below. Separate them with clearly defined headers.
What was the outcome of your simulation?
What scenarios were you presented with and what decisions did you make?
What specific social institutions, structures, and inequalities were evident in this game and how were economic inequalities perpetuated throughout your experience?
Do you believe you experienced relative or absolute poverty? Justify your response.
Compare and contrast this experience with what we learned about global poverty. Do you think compared to global poverty you experienced relative or absolute poverty? Why?
What privileges may you have been afforded?
You are welcome to use a graphic template for this assignment (such as Adobe, Canva (Links to an external site.), or Microsoft Office365) or create a visual presentation that includes each of these components. Images and creativity are strongly encouraged. However, if you choose to submit a creative presentation you must provide sufficient detail that shows mastery of the concepts and clearly includes detailed discussion of each component above. Please discuss with me if you are unsure of how to submit a creative presentation.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/