USC PF Strawson RM Hare & JL Austen Analytic Philosophy Questions

December 17, 2022

USC PF Strawson RM Hare & JL Austen Analytic Philosophy QuestionsDescription
Please answer three questions, no two of which are on the same philosopher. Each answer should be between 300 and 400 words.
-Links to texts are embedded in title names
-An answer to only one question is needed for sections with more than one question

Section II: Strawson’s on Truth and Moral Responsibility (P.F. Strawson, Truth; Analysis, 9, 1949)
3. What is determinism and how is it thought by some to threaten moral responsibility? How does Strawson use “reactive attitudes” to counter that threat, while continuing to recognize genuine circumstances in which moral responsibility is diminished or suspended?
Section III: Hare’s Theory of Goodness (R.M. Hare, Language of Morals ch 5-8)
4. Explain Hare’s analysis of the primary meaning of sentences of the form x is a good N. What is the main problem with it?
5. Sketch the reasoning behind Hares claim that the primary meaning of sentences of the form x is a good N can’t be descriptivist. How might a descriptivist respond?
Section V: Austins Sense and Sensibilia (J.L. Austin, Sense & Sensibilia; A.J. Ayer, Has Austin Refuted the Sense-Datum Theory in Metaphysics and Common Sense)
9. Explain Austins argument that some claims about the external world can be known without evidence. Why does the argument fail?
10. Austin rejects theories of perception according to which what we directly see are images private to ourselves. Explain how the theory arises and Austins most important criticisms of it.

USC PF Strawson RM Hare & JL Austen Analytic Philosophy Questions

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.