Unit Two: The Critical Review Essay Analysis

Unit Two: The Critical Review Essay Analysis

Instructions/Descriptions

Unit Two: The Critical Review Essay Analysis

[Order Now]

A Critical Review is an objective analysis or ‘critique’ of a chosen subject, showing your opinion about the quality or lack of quality

of that subject. For this essay, you will choose an art form or piece of entertainment to critique, such as a movie, play, museum,

music album, or game. Like all our essays, critical reviews are more than just a summary of the subject. It is a purposeful analysis

of a subject, exploring both the positive and negative aspects with a distinct thesis statement about the subject.

Here are the steps we’ll take in writing your Critical Review Essay:

1. Choose a subject to review.
2. Design a THESIS STATEMENT that includes:
3. a clear opinion on the subject
4. mention of three specific aspects of the subject you will elaborate on in the body of the review
5. Develop an Outline mapping the main points of your review.
6. Draft & Revision of a 3-4 page Critical Review Essay due in Week 7.

CRITICAL REVIEW THESES

Once you have chosen a subject, scrutinize it for qualities, drawbacks, context and themes. Your Critical Review thesis should

state your position on the subject by defining the value or lack of value of your chosen subject based on criteria you will later

establish. Below are some examples of Critical Review theses.

When reading, notice the A, B, C format to the theses, which is the formula to use for your own thesis:

Show/Movie Reviews:

• “’Hamilton,’ the most exciting and significant musical of the decade, is (a) sensationally potent in its message, (b) theatrically

vital for the genre and (c) plugged straight into the wall socket of contemporary music.” – WSJ

• “Star Wars is a remarkable confection: (a) a subliminal history of the movies (b) wrapped in a riveting tale of suspense and

adventure (c) ornamented with some of the most ingenious special effects ever contrived for film.” – Time, 1977

• “… Robert Eggers crafts a uniquely horrific tale using (a) a bold cinematic style, (b) an incredibly realized gothic setting, and (c)

a complex human relationship that together show a deep knowledge of the film medium and its effect on the audience.”

– Michael M., ‘How the Lighthouse Crafts a Modern Legend,’ ENG101

Album Reviews:

• “Most of Dr. Dre’s The Chronic is sometimes a frightening amalgam of inner-city street games that includes misogynist sexual

politics and violent revenge scenarios, though the album (a) drops raw realism in its lyrics, (b) defines the sub-genre of West Coast

rap, and (c) pays tribute to hip-hop virtuosity throughout.” – Rolling Stone

• “Drake’s fifth proper studio album [‘Scorpion’] is (a) richly produced, (b) studded with gems, and (c) grapples with his fatherhood

in a way that casts his arrested development into sharp relief.” – Jamieson Cox, Pitchfork.com

• “Dismissing the Sex Pistol’s Never Mind the Bollocks as merely a series of loud, ragged mid-tempo rockers with a harsh, grating

vocalist and not much melody would be a terrible error. Never Mind the Bollocks offers (a) spirited rock & roll riffs, (b) unbridled

emotional energy and (c) scathing but contemplative lyrics that perfectly articulated the frustration, rage, and dissatisfaction of

the British working class.” – Allmusic.com

[Order Now]

Video Game Reviews from METACRITIC.COM

• “It doesn’t solve some of the oldest issues of the saga, but ‘Assassin’s Creed: Black Flag’ is nonetheless a great piece of

entertainment software, especially thanks to (a) the rich environment, (b) interesting underlying plot and (c) almost infinite list of

discoveries to have while merely wandering around.”

• The ‘Last Guardian’ suffers from some technical and input issues, but this warm, beautiful adventure game is filled with (a) dynamic

gameplay, (b) unprecedented visual design, and (c) countless touching moments in a story we’ll never forget for the rest of our lives.

The Last Guardian is not just a game, it’s an absolute work of art.”

NOTE: A common mistake made in Critical Review essays is having too much summary!

Unit Two: The Critical Review Essay Analysis

RUBRIC Excellent Quality 95-100%   Introduction 45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Literature Support 91-84  points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Methodology 58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. Average Score 50-85% 40-38 points More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. 83-76  points There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. 52-49  points The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Poor Quality 0-45% 37-1 points The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. 75-1 points There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. 48-1 points There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Unit Two: The Critical Review Essay Analysis Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/

Unit Two: The Critical Review Essay Analysis

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!