Order Number |
5637567677 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
PART A: Case Study: Unconscionable Contracts and Clauses (15 POINTS)
DIRECTIONS : This MANDATORY Writing Assignment is a case study based on Chapt. 12 (pages 297-303) in the 11th edition of BUSINESS LAW TODAY- STANDARD EDITION. The text for your case study is provided on the next page (p.2).
the legal terms and concepts from your text readings, and any applicable case law precedent found in the textbook that supports your decision. You are developing an informed answer to a business law problem in answering the case questions. This is a major part of the case study writing assignment! A significant deduction of points will occur for a poorly written and any “short” analysis of the legal reasons that support your decision.
DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. note your resources including internet resources; case law found in text; etc. Use your own words! You will not be wrong if you state your Decision and Legal Reasons with clarity and use good business law principles and “judgment” or “logic” in terms of your analysis. However, I cannot read or comprehend what is not written. I’m looking for you to provide a clear decision, to demonstrate a critical understanding of your decision and support for your decision through thoughtful legal reasoning and critical thinking.
CASE STUDY TEXT: Unconscionable Contracts or Clauses
Geographic Expeditions, Inc. (GeoEx), which guided climbs up Mount Kilimanjaro, required climbers to sign a release to participate in the expedition. The form required disputes to be submitted to arbitration in San Francisco, limited damages to the cost of the trip, and included a clause which released GeoEx from all liability in the event of physical injury no matter who is at fault. GeoEx told climbers that the terms were nonnegotiable and that other travel firms offering the same or similar services imposed the same terms on their customers.
Jason Lotka singed the release and participated in one of the GeoEx expeditions. Unfortunately, he died on the GeoEx climb. His mother filed suit in a California court against GeoEx. GeoEx sought to have the case dismissed and to force the mother to engage in arbitration in San Francisco.
Are both the arbitration and limitation on damages clauses unconscionable contract clauses? Why or why not? Explain the basis for your conclusions.
Is the release from liability clause enforceable?
What factors will a court examine in determining if a release (exculpatory) clause should be enforced? Under what circumstances is a court likely to enforce such an exculpatory clause?