UCLA Netflix Discussion According To Postman

November 28, 2022

UCLA Netflix Discussion According To Postman

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

UCLA Netflix Discussion According To Postman

[Order Now]

Tally the approximate number of hours you believe you spend every week engaged with mass media.

This includes input from any medium—websites, television, streaming video (Netflix, Hulu, and any such channels) and audio, radio, and so on—that is consumed by a large number of people. Add it up. How many hours each week do you spend watching TV shows and movies—on the TV or on your computer (or phone)? How many hours each week do you spend reading news articles online? How many hours each week do you spend listening to the radio? (Include podcasts and time spent listening to radio stations—including subscription radio, like Sirius—in your car.)

Include anything that was meant for a large group of people to see or hear (as opposed to a text message, for example). Think of how much time you spend “plugged in” to any and all sources. You could also calculate for one typical day, then multiply by 7 to get your weekly total. Tell us your number—how many hours?

[Order Now]

Considering what you’ve learned from EACH OF 1) Postman in Amusing Ourselves to Death, 2) Kilbourne in Killing Us Softly IV, and 3) Chomsky in Manufacturing Consent, explain in about 300 words the effect your media consumption should have on you. This part should be based in the course materials, e.g. “According to Postman…”

Honestly considering what you know about who you are, do you think Postman was right about mass media’s effect on society, both as individuals and as a whole? This paragraph should be about 200 words

UCLA Netflix Discussion According To Postman

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.