Trust and Power

January 11, 2023

Trust and Power

Order Number	653467676787
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Trust and Power

To prepare for this assignment: Review Chapter 5, “Trust, Trust Development, and Trust Repair” (pp. 104-113 and 115-129), in the course text, The Handbook of Conflict Resolution, paying particular attention to the conceptualization of trust and what role it can play in conflict and conflict resolution. Bring to mind your Final Project conflict and think about what kind of trust might come into play in your conflict and how it might do so. Consider to what extent trust exists between or among the parties in your conflict and what you might do to build trust or capitalize on that which exists. Review the video, “Building Trust Before Negotiating.” Consider whether the parties in your Final Project conflict have owned up to past mistakes and how you, as a third party, might go about building trust between/among the parties. Review Chapter 6, “Power and Conflict” (pp. 137-151 only), in the course text, The Handbook of Conflict Resolution, focusing on the discussion of power and its distinctions and components. Think about your Final Project conflict in light of the discussion about power and its distinctions and components. Consider how power is expressed in the conflict, and how each of the topics relates to your specific situation, parties, and issues. The assignment: (2-3 pages) Briefly describe your Final Project conflict, its central issues, and the parties involved. Explain how trust, and what kind of trust, might or does come into play in your conflict and/or its resolution. Explain what you might do to build trust and/or capitalize on trust that exists in your situation and with the parties in your conflict. Explain how power might come into play, or is in play, in your conflict or its resolution. Reference the discussion and distinctions of power presented in your text. Be specific and provide examples to illustrate your points. Describe one personal and one environmental factor”that affect your behavior and responses to power”that are most relevant to your conflict, and explain why.

[Order Now]

Trust and Power

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.