Traditional Negligence of a Car Collision Discussion

December 2, 2022

Traditional Negligence of a Car Collision Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Traditional Negligence of a Car Collision Discussion

[Order Now]

write 150 words for each of the 3 cases

With Driver at the wheel, Driver and Passenger motored into town. Passenger fell asleep

during the trip. Driver parked 5 feet from a fire hydrant, next to a bank, in violation of a
municipal statute which bans parking within 10 feet of a fire hydrant. Driver went into
the bank to make a deposit. Passenger remained asleep. Trucker, who was driving
down the street where the bank is located, suddenly swerved the truck to avoid hitting a
dog which darted into the street and in front of Trucker’s truck. Trucker’s truck smashed
into Driver’s car resulting in a serious injury to Passenger.
Had Driver parked anywhere else, Trucker’s truck would not have smashed into Driver’s
car and injured Passenger. Passenger sued Driver in Negligence. Discuss whether
Passenger will recover in Negligence Per Se as against Driver. Passenger sued Trucker
in Negligence. Discuss whether Passenger will recover as against Trucker in Traditional
Negligence.

Paul produce made the following statement to barbie buyer…..”hey barbie, i am thinking of selling my complete supply of bananas for 10 cents per pound.” discuss your legal position on whether the statement is an offer. If so, how long does it remain an offer? Now assume that paul scribbled the above quoted words on the skin of a banana, gave the banana skin to barbie and told barbie that he was leaving soon for south america in order to get a new supply of bananas to sell. Discuss your legal position on whether the “banana skin” is an offer. If so, how long does it remain an offer? Now assume that paul was in his garage working on his 1962 studebaker lark. During this work session, paul felt chilly. Paul lit a bundle of rags and wood chips in order to start a small flame so that he could warm up. Unfortunately, because of the fire, the bananas that paul and barbie had discussed blew up and turned into useless “banana mush.” now barbie wants to accept the banana offer. Discuss the legal issues raised above. Use legal rules and concepts to support your legal discussion.

[Order Now]

Phyllis fuller is 17 years old. Phyllis wants to buy a corvette automobile.
The price of the corvette is 82000 dollars. Phyllis works as a cash
register operator at the greasy spoon restaurant. Phyllis earns 12 dollars per hour. Phyllis
works 20 hours per week.

Bob ferapples is a corvette dealer. Phyllis went to bob’s dealership
and informed bob of phyllis’ desire to buy a new corvette.

Using relevant material as presented in the text, advise bob how
bob could structure this deal to make it work. Include all legal rules

Traditional Negligence of a Car Collision Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.