To Plan Design Deliver and Evaluate an Original Training Program

January 23, 2023

To Plan Design Deliver and Evaluate an Original Training Program

Order Number	6576436452365653
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

To Plan Design Deliver and Evaluate an Original Training Program

Please use the attached draft and add more details for the 20 page PPT. Please incorporate the following feedback below.

Peer Feedback: I think there is enough mystery around cybersecurity to really generate interest and curiosity from employees at any level. Microlearning is the way to go with a topic like this! I love learning playlists like on LinkedIn learning or even the ones in our textbook. Brief and easily digested material make for the most engaging training initiatives (Baer, 2020). I think the main reason why microlearning is catching on so fast it because it is an easy way of learning while also fulfilling life and work responsibilities. As we see with this class even, education in small doses is far easier to achieve success in than when you have to devote all waking hours to one task. Microlearning enables the learner to still get work done while participating in career development. I found another potential source on Forbes- listed below.

Reference:

Baer, S. (2020, March 19). Microlearning: The future of professional development. Forbes. Retrieved January 23, 2023, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbeshumanresourcescouncil/2020/03/19/microlearning-the-future-of-professional-development/?sh=12ec97567faf

Must, T. (2022, December 12). Council post: Cybersecurity Training Management: A how-to guide. Forbes. Retrieved January 23, 2023, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2022/12/09/cybersecurity-training-management-a-how-to-guide/?sh=6a58c82c42d5

Assignment instructions:

Conduct a needs assessment for your proposed training program. This should include both a person and a task analysis.

Develop SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Timely) training objectives based on the needs assessment and any assumptions you may need to make.

Create an original, detailed training proposal. This should include:

A title and description of the program.

A discussion of training methods to be used, and a rationale (justification) for using them, based on training theory.

Proposed instructors and the reason for using them.

A tentative training outline.

A tentative list and description of training materials needed.

Develop a plan for evaluation of training effectiveness including both short-term and long-term evaluation where appropriate.

Your presentation must be formatted according to APA style

[Order Now]

To Plan Design Deliver and Evaluate an Original Training Program

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.