Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
This week you will complete a journal focused on the social determinant of
health in the U.S. This activity will help you understand how they harm
society.
Within your own words, write a 600+ word single-spaced journal entry
answering the following:
journal, only focus on five.
selected is important to our society. Apply at least two social
concepts and one social theory.
they have a negative impact on the health outcomes of at least three
minority populations (e.g, Asian American, Hispanic, African-
American). Please be sure to identify the specific populations. For
example, you might explain how employment, status, and where a
person lives (3) has an impact on the Hispanic population (one
population). You would do the same for Asian Americans.
to address it (3 recommendations). Simply, what three
recommendations might you make to decrease negative health
outcomes associated with a lack of health insurance?
For this assignment, you are not required to include sources. You
are required to include three subheadings to identify the section
(Addressing Social Determinants of Health, Negative Impact on a Minority
Population, Recommendations for Addressing Social Determinants of
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/