the poem "Strange Fruit," by Abel Meeropol

December 20, 2022

the poem “Strange Fruit,” by Abel Meeropol

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

the poem “Strange Fruit,” by Abel Meeropol

You are using the following three works as inspiration: the photo of the lynching of Thomas Shipp and Abram Smith 1930; the poem “Strange Fruit,” by Abel Meeropol that was inspired by this photo; and the song that he turned the poem into that was sung by Billie Holiday.

For the project, I would like you to use these works/ one of the works, as inspiration for something you create. How have the works spoken to you? What did they say to you? What story do they tell about the lives of African Americans? What issues do they talk about? Racism? Violence against Black bodies? Oppression? Discrimination? Absence of justice for black people in America? Now think about what you can create, as a response to these works and their themes. Can you write a poem? Do you wish to write a song? A spoken word? DO a drawing ?

Have an interview with someone about the meaning of these three works? Maybe you want to write a reflection paper that considers the meaning and significance of these three diff works. What about a collage of images that speak a thousand words about oppression and racism in America and,you write about? How about you compare two images- the lynching photo and a photo from the recent protests? Perhaps, the lynching photo and the one of the police officer with his knee on George Floyd’s neck? Maybe ,

compare two protest songs, The Strange Fruit , song and a protest song from today.And yo u discuss how songs have been used, since slave songs, as forms of protest.r the Final Project

the poem “Strange Fruit,” by Abel Meeropol

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.