The Laws Governing Shareholder Derivative Lawsuits in the US

December 2, 2022

The Laws Governing Shareholder Derivative Lawsuits in the US

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

The Laws Governing Shareholder Derivative Lawsuits in the US

[Order Now]

Instructions for #GEA2:

No unread replies.No replies.INInstructions #GEA2

Today, most of the claims brought against directors and officers in the United States are those alleged in shareholders’ derivative lawsuits. Other nations, however, put more restrictions on the use of such lawsuits. German law, for example, does not provide for derivative litigation, and a corporation’s duty to its employees is just as significant as its duty to the shareholder-owners of the company. The United Kingdom has no statute authorizing derivative actions, which are permitted only to challenge directors’ actions that the shareholders could not legally ratify. Japan authorizes derivative actions but also permits a company to sue the plaintiff-shareholder for damages if the action is unsuccessful.

Assignment:

(1) Research the laws/statutes/rules/court cases governing shareholder derivative lawsuits in one of the nations listed above or any other nation.

(2) In a minimum 250-word post, please:

(a) Cite the law/statute/rule/court case governing shareholder derivative lawsuits of the nation you chose; and

(b) Explain if the shareholder derivative lawsuit has encouraged businesses to be more or less culturally responsible? Give at least one specific example.

[Order Now]

Research Information/Suggestions:

Please use reliable and credible search engines (please do not use Wikipedia).
This website has great information on research skills: http://lib.usfsp.edu/sb.php?subject_id=136086(Links to an external site.).
I suggest using either Westlaw or Lexis-Nexis which can be found under Databases once you log into the USF Library network.
Don’t hesitate to ask a Librarian for assistance!

Citations:

You may use the APA, MLA or Turabian format. For information on how to cite your research, please visit this website: https://lib.usfsp.edu/Citations(Links to an external site.).
Please put your citations into your assignment. The citations do not count towards the word count.

The Laws Governing Shareholder Derivative Lawsuits in the US

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.