The International Economics paper

January 7, 2023

The International Economics paper

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

The International Economics paper

Guidelines for the Nobel Project for the International Economics Course 1. Google “Nobel economics” and click on first result. Chose an economic laureate, which is different from other students. 2. Read press release, presentation speech, autobiography, prize lecture, banquet speech and any other thing you can find. 3. Go to “EconLit” from the library website, search under the author name and see what you get. 4. Look at the author index in your textbooks and find your Nobel laureate. Read everything the books tell you about her or him. 5. Look at The Economist, Wall Street Journal, New York Times for articles written about and by your Nobel Laureate. 6. Relate the work by the Laureate you chose to the topics of the course. 7. Make sure to cite all your sources carefully on EACH slide and add at the end a Reference List. 8. Exhausted from all of these reading generate 25 slides.

9. In the remote possibility, if we will have a TA paid by the Department of Economics and Business exclusively as a TA for this course, then this project will constitute ten percent (10%) of your grade. Otherwise, the weight of this project is zero percent. Nevertheless, you are expected to do a good job, or REQUIRED to fix your presentation to my sole satisfaction. Be prepared to present your work on or after the deadline. Failing to present your PowerPoint presentation when asked will cause your grade to be F, for the whole course.

10. If you have a question, kindly email me to my gmail address. 11. Have fun throughout the project; balance your life, go to a movie, a concert, etc. 14 Recommendation Thank you for writing on behalf of XXX. We are interested in your candid assessment of XXX’s academic achievement, personal character and contribution to your school community. We find that a recommendation between 300 and 600 words is the most helpful in understanding your student. Feel free to share your general observations, including specific examples or anecdotes. We offer the following questions as possible guidelines to your comments: · What motivates XXX academically? · How did XXX stand out compared to classmates, either academically or personally? · How was XXX able to work effectively and respectfully with those with different perspectives or from different backgrounds? · Is there anything else in your knowledge of XXX that you would like to bring to our attention? In particular, if XXX has had to overcome particular adversity or challenges, or any limitations on the curriculum or extracurricular involvement, please

[Order Now]

The International Economics paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.