The Importance Of Learning In Organizations Discussion

November 26, 2022

The Importance Of Learning In Organizations Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

The, Importance, Of, Learning, In, Organizations, Discussion

[Order Now]

Further research is likely needed into what is meant by and what constitutes a learning organization. After you research this topic, answer the questions below. Be sure to cite your resources.

How can the safety and health professional contribute to enhancing or developing their organization into a learning organization?

What benefits do you expect to abound from these actions?

Applied Safety Training

For the Applied Safety Training activity, complete the following:

Determine a safety training topic that needs to be addressed by you, safety personnel, human resources, or supervisors within your work organization. If you are unable to do this or do not work for an organization, choose a required safety training requirement from the OSHA Standards and Training Guidelines (reviewed early in the module). If you cannot relate this to a work organization, develop a hypothetical situation/work case, but communicate this in your write-up.

Identify why this training needs to be completed. In other words, develop and conduct a needs assessment and present this information supporting the need for the training.

Develop and present a training plan in your write-up. You should discuss your intended audience, present your objectives for the training (make sure these objectives are written in a format that they can be evaluated), discuss how the training will be conducted and the proposed medium, along with a justification for the proposed methods.

Develop a plan as to how you will evaluate your training program. Your evaluation plan should address how you plan to assess whether safety training objectives were met and should address the four levels established by Kirkpatrick’s method of evaluation. Further, discuss how you would assess return on investment for this training.

What and how do each of these things contribute to the destabilizing of Earth’s atmosphere and its climate? 1a. cows? 1b. cars? 1c. chainsaws?

Earth’s Greatest Enemies?

Climatologist James Lovelock ( (originator of the ) once said that Earth’s greatest enemies were the Three C’s: cars, cows and chainsaws because of their contributions to destabilizing planetary climate.

In this final Discussion Forum, you will answer the following question to show your ability to find connections among the environmental issues that you have learned about in this course.
Number your responses so I can see you have addressed each part.

You must cite specific evidence from any Unit of the course to support each of your responses.
Each contributing factor is worth 4 points x 3 = 12 points.

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

The Importance Of Learning In Organizations Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.