The Hunting Grounds Film Essay Discussion

The Hunting Grounds Film Essay Discussion

Instructions/Descriptions

The Hunting Grounds Film Essay Discussion

[Order Now]

This week’s film: The Hunting Ground

PART I (7 Points): One of the survivors interviewed in the film said, “My rape was bad, but the way I was treated [by the institution] was worse.” Another survivor pointed out that the “lack of change [on campus] affects students more than our rape[s].” Explain these statements by providing evidence from the film. You must address the following points:

The film illuminates the ways in which victims are blamed and perpetrators are protected. Explain the motivations of the institution as depicted in the film. How did the administrators and institutions in the film respond to reports of sexual violence on campus? How did they treat the survivors? What kinds of questions did they ask and what impacts, both short and long term, did these questions have on the victims? Be specific and provide examples

The film’s examination of sexual violence perpetrated by athletes includes this statistical information: “Less than four percent of college students are athletes; 19 percent of rapes and sexual assaults on college campuses are perpetrated by athletes.” Why are athletes more likely to perpetrate these crimes than non-athletes? One of the experts interviewed in the film states “sports teams are a business.” How can this fact impact the behavior of athletes and their treatment by the institution? Be specific and provide examples

According to Andrew Lohse and other experts, fraternities often reward sexual violence, as “brothers” compete with one another and bond over stories of sexual conquest. Discuss the relationship of fraternities and sexual violence on college campuses. Be sure to discuss the role of unregulated alcohol use in fraternity life. What are the conflicts/motivations of the institution in holding fraternities accountable for sexual violence? Be specific and provide examples

Part II (3 Points): What are the short-and long-term impacts for women who experience sexual violence while in college? These impacts include long-term psychological and emotional distress, completion of education, and impacts on career choices, to name only a few. Your task this week is to make one connection to BOTH Chapters 9 AND 15 (Gender and Education) to the film. Be specific and provide examples.

The film illuminates the ways in which victims are blamed and perpetrators are protected. Explain the motivations of the institution as depicted in the film. How did the administrators and institutions in the film respond to reports of sexual violence on campus? How did they treat the survivors? What kinds of questions did they ask and what impacts, both short and long term, did these questions have on the victims? Be specific and provide examples.The Hunting Ground is an inspiring documentary that captures the fact of sexual violence on college campuses and examines how institutions and college administrators are motivated to protect the perpetrators rather than the victims. That is considered the cost of doing business in education industry, the film argues. According to the statistics, almost 1 in 5 female students or 16 to 20 percent of undergraduate women, as well as an unknown number of male students, are raped or sexually assaulted during their years on campus.

In other words, “more than 100,000 college students will be raped during the coming school year”, but most of them never report it, and those who do often regret their choice. In most cases, school officials are determined to keep assaults from going public because accurately reporting incidents of sexual violence would severely impact the school’s standing and reputations. As said by an interviewee, “Schools are actively and aggressively not wanting to tell the truth about what is going on their campuses”.

Many Ivy League schools like Harvard, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Amherst College, and Notre dame, typically ignore the students’ safety and justice in order to shield their financial and marketing imperatives. They are likely to manipulate and exploit the vulnerability of victims to avoid any possibility of lawsuits or losing potential investors. Consequently, survivors usually find themselves silenced, victim-blamed, dissuaded from reporting incidents, or in difficulties if they attempt to do so. Similarly, a culture of silence prevails along with fear of retaliation and punishment often keep faculty and administrators from acknowledging the problem or speaking up for those students in public.

Given that 6 university presidents declined to be interviewed in the film, and ‘many of the crimes are not reported to the police by the faculty’, confirmed by a staff member.Although 95 percent of college presidents say their institutions handle sexual assault “appropriately”, the facts obviously reveal otherwise.

They would only treat the assault when it is an isolated case, and the accusations are not aimed at fraternities or athletics, the two powerful elements of the system that colleges and universities have much more to gain from. Then in most remaining cases, college administrators will reject assault reports than to aggressively pursue and expel perpetrators, because their priority is “to protect the institution from harm, not the student from harm”.

Normally, college administrators often tell the victims not to talk to anyone about the issue, just to ignore or minimize their experiences, or turn into victim-blaming responses, like “What were you wearing?”, “What were you drinking?”, “How much did you have to drink?”, “Did you say no?”, “How many times did you say no?”, “How did you say it?”, “Why didn’t you fight him?”. In other words, the investigators want to establish the facts that Was this your fault? and What could you have done differently? Like one of the survivors expressed, “my rape was bad but the way I was treated afterwards was worse”.

Through a set of questions that tend to misplace responsibility for the crime onto the victims, the schools aim to create a culture of victim-blaming that significantly discourages reporting the incidents while creating barriers blocking access to justice. As a result, “88 percent of women raped on campus do not report”, the film cited. That is what they called the college’s “appropriate” response to an allegation of rape within their campuses.

Another example is a scene when Annie Clark reported her rape to the school administrator, but got a victim-blaming reply instead of consolation, “Rape is like a football game, Annie, and if you look back on the game what would you do differently in that situation?”. Even when they can make a formal report to administrators, “no matter what you do, you’re not going to win”.In The Hunting Ground, sexual assault reports are repeatedly ignored, investigations are often delayed, many cases are never pursued, survivors are often shamed, and perpetrators are rarely punished. Given that, there are 259 sexual assaults reported during the period 1996 and 2013 at Stanford University, but only one case resulted in the expulsion.

The number of expulsions of male students at other six top schools is also very low. Other absurd punishments imposed on perpetrators include an official warning, a book report, a small fine of $25, one day to one week suspension, community service at rape clinics, or just a paper to write. There is also a young man who sexually assaulted woman was penalized with “expulsion after graduation”. With those laughable punishments, perpetrators keep committing these crimes as they can easily get away with acts of sexual violence.

For example, a Swarthmore student in the film describes an assaulter who sexually assaulted four other students, showing the fact that sexual assaulters are overwhelmingly repeat offenders. Campus assaults keep happening, as another survivor said “lack of change [on campus] affects students more than our rape[s]”. The schools’ poor handling of sexual assaults not only creates “an unsafe environment” in which “less than 8 percent of men in college commit more than 90 percent of sexual assaults”, but also violates Title IX, the law that forbids sex-based discrimination in education. When academic institutions have not done appropriately to handle sexual-assault allegations and stop sexual violence, rapists will be allowed to remain on campus and create an aggressive educational situation for survivors.

The film’s examination of sexual violence perpetrated by athletes includes this statistical information: “Less than four percent of college students are athletes; 19 percent of rapes and sexual assaults on college campuses are perpetrated by athletes.” Why are athletes more likely to perpetrate these crimes than non-athletes? One of the experts interviewed in the film states “sports teams are a business.”

How can this fact impact the behavior of athletes and their treatment by the institution? Be specific and provide examples.According to The Hunting Ground, student athletes only account for less than 4 percent of the student body, yet they commit 19 percent of all campus rape and sexual assaults, the majority of offenders, because they are taking the advantage of their privileged status, a symbol of college sports superstar.

The film also posits that big-time college sports, like football and basketball, are businesses and such moneymakers, “There’s a multibillion-dollar industry that wraps around these young men”. Everything the student-athletes do would largely affect the financial benefits of their home schools. Therefore, even though college athletes are involved in a number of highly-publicized campus assaults, in many cases, they are thoroughly protected by school administrators from the accusations of rape. F

or example, in The Hunting Ground, Notre Dame police officers admitted that they were not allowed to contacting the student-athletes at practice or at their campus housing, even those suspected of violations. “Police cannot contact an athlete at any athletic facility and we cannot contact any athlete to assist us in contracting the athlete”, the film reported. So, students like Jameis Winston, a star quarterback and Heisman Trophy winner, who has been linked to multiple sexual assaults, but never brought to justice.

Or the young men who was accused by Lizzy Seeberg for an alleged assault, still playing for Notre Dame, at the time the campus police officer claimed to be conducting a search for him.Likewise, due to the culture of entitlement surrounding athletes, survivors would face more challenges and criticism when accusing a student athlete of sexual assault on campus, especially when the accused is a superstar athlete. Survivors would often face apathy, blame, threats, and retaliation from other students, school administrators and law enforcement.

For example, Erica Kinsman, the fellow student who accused Jamies Winston, the Florida State University quarterback and Heisman Trophy winner, of drugging and raping her, was subjected to public shaming. Kinsman was called a “slut” and a “whore” preying on Winston’s fame. No one stood on her side. Even when performing a rape kit, Kinsman was told that she “really should think long and hard about whether you want to press charges or not” because “this is a huge football town”. The school and law enforcement officials glossed over her complaints.

“There was no investigation at all”, no progressive actions were ever made, they only said, “things that happened that night were … not good”. No charges were filed against Winston, and he was cleared of conduct violations. The trouble did not prevent him from being one of the top prospects for the 2015 NFL draft. At last, Winston went on to win the Heisman Trophy, but Erica Kinsman was ultimately hounded out of school.

According to Andrew Lohse and other experts, fraternities often reward sexual violence, as “brothers” compete with one another and bond over stories of sexual conquest. Discuss the relationship of fraternities and sexual violence on college campuses. Be sure to discuss the role of unregulated alcohol use in fraternity life. What are the conflicts/motivations of the institution in holding fraternities accountable for sexual violence? Be specific and provide examples.According to The Hunting Ground, fraternity members are three times more likely to commit sexual assaults than other male students in college, due to the culture that reinforces within group activities. Similar to college sports, the film posits that fraternity is also a business, and an incredibly well-funded network for most academic institutions.

Colleges and universities gain a lot of publicity and funds from the fraternities once they can get alumni back on campus. As provided by the film, fraternity alumni account for 60 percent of all university donations over $100 million. Therefore, even though fraternities are linked to the settings for many sexual assaults at colleges around the country, in many cases, schools do not take much actions in order to avoid possible law suits.

They often protect fraternities from the accusations, whose members form strong institutional bonds and become a source of future donations. Money apparently speaks louder than the problems of sexual assaults on college campus. Consider the example of Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE), one of America’s largest domestic fraternities, has now become “Sexual Assault Expected” for its well-known acronym.In recent years, fraternities become synonymous with partying and the center of social scene at many colleges.

More often, fraternities are outside of the control that colleges and universities normally place on student housing. There is always an idea that fraternity houses are places where students can come to drink on every Friday and Saturday nights, regardless of whether they are allowed to consume alcohol or not. In other words, fraternities are just unregulated bars with a complete flow of unregulated alcohol, that support the college party culture and provide opportunities for the commission of sexual assaults on campus.

Because heavy alcohol consumption can increase the likelihood of intimate partner violence. So, fraternity members are more likely to hold and act on that belief, “She wanted to have sex since she was drinking at the party”. As Ziering and Dick explain in the film, 90 percent of the campus assaults involve with a typical scenario of acquaintance rapes, whereby young women, most of them recently arrived at college campuses, had too much to drink at a fraternity party, and in some cases were drugged, then engaged in things that later turn violent.

The Hunting Grounds Film Essay Discussion

The Hunting Grounds Film Essay Discussion

Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/

The Hunting Grounds Film Essay Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!