The Epic of Gilgamesh Enkidu and Gilgamesh Analysis

November 29, 2022

The Epic of Gilgamesh Enkidu and Gilgamesh Analysis

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

The Epic of Gilgamesh Enkidu and Gilgamesh Analysis

[Order Now]

This assignment is based on Module 3.2.2: Gilgamesh as Hero Please review these units and complete the primary source reading about Gilgamesh and Enkidu’s journey to the Forest of Cedars in Tablets II–V of The Epic of Gilgamesh, pp. 18–47 (PDF),

3.2.2 Gilgamesh as Hero & Primary Source Analysis Paragraph #1Please read through this unit. Your assignment instructions are below.Once Gilgamesh and Enkidu become friends, one of their first quests together is to the Forest of Cedars where they defeat the monster Humbaba and bring timber back to Mesopotamia. Most lumber in the ancient Middle East was exported from the modern-day region of Lebanon. It is safe to assume that Gilgamesh and Enkidu journeyed from the region of present-day Iraq (Mesopotamia) to present-day Lebanon on this quest. (Side note: The flag of Lebanon features a cedar tree to commemorate the state’s historic and contemporary significance as a lumber capital). Before they embarked on the quest, Gilgamesh consulted with the elders of Uruk who warned Gilgamesh and Enkidu of the potential dangers.

The Epic of Gilgamesh Enkidu and Gilgamesh Analysis

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.