Order Number |
65376546457864567 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY/DISERTATION |
Writer Level |
PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED |
Format |
APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD |
Academic Sources |
10 -20 |
Page Count |
4-8 PAGES |
The Effect of Handwashing with Water or Soap on Bacterial Contamination of Hands
The Effect of Handwashing with Water or Soap on Bacterial Contamination of Hands Schmidt et. al. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 97-104; doi:10.3390/ijerph8010097 Make a statement of the Problem/Goals: In one sentence in your own words, state succinctly the question the paper addresses. Why is this important? What particular goals do these researchers have in addressing this problem? Technical Approach: What are the specific names of the organisms that these researchers are studying? In a few sentences in your own words, what is this group’s approach to tackling the stated problem? What are their methods? What groups are they testing and how are they being tested? Discussion/Critique: How did the researchers evaluate their efforts? Did they measure anything? Look at the graphs in Figure 1. What are the three independent variables (groups) on the x-axis? What is the dependent (measured) variable on the y-axis? Is there any difference in the dependent variable measurements between these groups? Which group of bacteria (graph) has the lowest p-value when comparing water only to no handwashing? What does this mean? *Remember lower p-values are more significant because the p-value is the probability you would get the same result by random chance Which group of bacteria has the highest p-value if you compare water-only to soap and water? What does this mean? *Remember, higher p-values are less significant because higher p-values mean more likely to have happened by chance. Are these experiments enough? What conclusions did they draw from their evaluation results? What limitations do the researchers mention with their approach? Do they suggest solutions? Given the evaluation results, what application/useful benefit/impact do the researchers/you see for this work?
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/
The Effect of Handwashing with Water or Soap on Bacterial Contamination of Hands