The Culture Production System (CPS) Business Discussions

December 3, 2022

The Culture Production System (CPS) Business Discussions

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

The Culture Production System (CPS) Business Discussions

[Order Now]

Culture, Production, System, (CPS), Business, Discussions

Question 1

As we end the semester on the subject of culture and subculture, we learn about the Culture Production System (CPS). Around the start of the pandemic, we saw the introduction of the prairie dress and many of us wondered if this was a trend that would catch on. Did you ever ask yourself how it started? In case you missed it, here is a photo and a few articles about the phenomenon, including the hilarious photo sessions of men and women wearing the dresses that went viral last fall.

For this discussion, I’m asking you to see if you can identify a current or emerging trend, its source, and what kind of traction it’s getting. In other words, break down the CPS for it: Where did it start? Where are you seeing the item(s) being worn, used or sold at retail? Do you think the trend will catch on? Why or why not?? Include photos and links to supporting evidence, if it exists.

https://www.boredpanda.com/target-dress-challenge/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=organic

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200609-the-prairie-look-that-keeps-coming-back

https://www.thecut.com/2019/02/the-pleasure-of-sitting-out-the-prairie-dress-trend.html

Question 2

This is the place for anything you find in the wild that has a consumer behavior lesson to it, and by in the wild, I meaning you’re not Googling things looking for stuff to post. You can post memes, ads, items you find in stores, (packaging and perception go together like bees and honey), signage, anything with a consumer behavior lesson to it like this EXAMPLE, which I’m sure most of you have seen floating around the internet these past few months. The best posts are examples of mistakes marketers made, or ones where maybe it’s a mistake or maybe it’s not, but it’s questionable.

You should address the following in your post:

What did the company do? (Post the example)

What’s the consumer behavior lesson here?

What do you think they were they trying to accomplish?

What did they seem to know or not know about consumer behavior that made them think was a good idea, and if it was NOT a good idea (these are the best things to post), why?

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

The Culture Production System (CPS) Business Discussions

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.