The Crucibles of Leadership and How it Relates to My Degree Goal

January 9, 2023

The Crucibles of Leadership & How it Relates to My Degree Goal

Order Number	6539787234765
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

The Crucibles of Leadership & How it Relates to My Degree Goal

After you locate and read the article, The Crucibles Of Leadership, prepare and submit a 3-4 page paper that summarizes what you learned as well as outlines your goals for this Masters of Arts Organizational Leadership (MAOL) program. Include a brief summary of your current understanding of leadership and what you hope to learn or gain from earning your Masters in Organizational Leadership. Be sure to adhere to APA guidelines when writing this post, use in-text citations and reference your work. Your paper should include the following 3 sections (please use APA subtitles):

1 Introduction:

In your introduction you should include at least one sentence that states your purpose for writing the paper. This will serve as your structure for the remainder of your paper. Article

2 Analysis:

Briefly summarize the article. Identify three (3) insights gained about leadership as compared to your own ideas about leadership.

3 Reflective Analysis:

What surprised you and what will you do differently to enhance your effectiveness? Identify three (3) goals you have for yourself in this competency, in this MAOL program and for your current/future career.

https://hbr.org/2002/09/crucibles-of-leadership

[Order Now]

The Crucibles of Leadership & How it Relates to My Degree Goal

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.