The Changing Society and Theories of Change Discussion

November 29, 2022

The Changing Society and Theories of Change Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

The Changing Society and Theories of Change Discussion

[Order Now]

9-The Changing Society

Our society is changing rapidly. As Human Service Professionals, it is imperative that we stay aware of how our society is changing and how those changes impact our clients as well as the services we provide our clients. Please use the assigned readings and use the Library to research peer-reviewed studies to support your post.

Please respond to the following:

Identify at least three societal problems that have occurred because of our changing society and identify what change in society you believe has led to this problem.

There are several different theories of change. Identify one theory of change that you agree with the most and explain why you agree with that theory.

Consumerism Culture Video Analysis Paper

This discussion board gives you the opportunity to give and receive feedback from your classmates about the work you are doing on Project 1. For this week’s discussion, you will complete the first steps towards writing next week’s essay. This week, you will only share your video, a summary of the highlights, and state which theory you think best applies to the video you chose.

[Order Now]

Respond to only these three prompts (about 100-150 words). DO NOT post the whole 3-page paper in this discussion:

Identify a video/DVD (from YouTube or elsewhere, like the Links to an external site.Films on Demand (Links to an external site.) database in the campus Library). Post the title and link (if available) at the beginning of your discussion post.

Provide a short summary of your video/DVD (What is the video about? Be clear, but don’t try to rewrite the whole script.)

Discuss/Explain which one of the three paradigms (functionalist, conflict, or symbolic interactionist) is the best fit for analyzing your video/DVD.

The Changing Society and Theories of Change Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.