Testing Hypothesis and Properties of Bivariate Relationship

December 22, 2022

Testing Hypothesis and Properties of Bivariate Relationship

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

[Order Now]

Description

Module 4: Critical Thinking

Submit Assignment

Points 120 Submitting a file upload

Critical Thinking Assignment (120 Points)

Important! Read First

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.

Option #1: Inferential Test

Criminologists have long studied the relationships between employment opportunity, upward mobility in society and criminality. For this assignment, we will evaluate a study of mobility that was conducted in Netherlands.

Read the “Determinants of Intergenerational Downward Mobility in the Netherlands” (Links to an external site.) article:

In a well-organized essay, answer the following questions. Review the assumptions made for each inferential test (based on the information in this chapter). Review the null hypothesis for each inferential test (based on the information in this chapter). How are final statistics (t-obtained, chi-square obtained, or F obtained) reported in the article? Based on the table or summary of final statistics, what conclusions do the authors make? Do they find support for their original hypothesis? Explain your answer. Option #2: Sampling Technique

In 2016, Australian researchers conducted a study on the fear of crime, “(Re)assessing Contemporary “Fear of Crime” Measures within an Australian Context.” (Links to an external site.)

Read this study publication and, in a well-organized essay, answer the following questions:

Discuss the sampling technique used by the original researchers and why they chose that technique (based on the information in this chapter).

Summarize the findings from the statistical tables presented in the textbook (based on the information in this chapter).

What final statistics were utilized to determine any correlations?

What conclusions do the authors make?

Do they find support for their original hypothesis?

Explain your answer. the reading Testing Hypothesis and Properties of Bivariate Relationship

[Order Now]

Testing Hypothesis and Properties of Bivariate Relationship

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.