Team Leadership Best Practices

January 7, 2023

Team Leadership Best Practices

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Team Leadership Best Practices

This week, you will develop a plan by thinking about how to develop teams in your workplace. What analysis can be applied to teams? In other words, what needs assessment can you do at the team level? How will you enhance the performance of teams? Planning and Execution How cohesive is your team? (Cohesion is a measurement of relationship, togetherness, and belongingness experienced by the team members.) What evidence can you provide to support your conclusions about team cohesion?

Are there any pieces of evidence that might contradict your conclusion? How might you increase the amount of team cohesion (in essence, what intervention methods, such as role-playing and so forth, would you use)? How productive is your team? (Productivity is a measurement of task fulfillment by team members.) What evidence can you provide to support your conclusions about team productivity? Are there any pieces of evidence that might contradict your conclusion?

How might you increase the amount of team productivity (e.g., what intervention methods would you use)? Who needs to be involved in the team development plan for it to be a success? What is the time frame for implementing your plan? Prepare a 5-page team plan that addresses the following issues: What is the organization you are working with (to remind your readers)? What is the team cohesion need that should be addressed, and what is the intervention for that need? What is the team productivity need that should be addressed, and what is the intervention for that need? Who will need to participate (at any level) in the training and development initiative? When will the initiative take place? What is the basic schedule for rolling out your initiative?

[Order Now]

Team Leadership Best Practices

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.